Acrylate Esters by Ethenolysis of Maleate Esters with Ru Metathesis Catalysts: an HTE and a Technoeconomic Study

Pascal S. Engl,Alexey Tsygankov,Jordan De Jesus Silva,Jean‐Paul Lange,Christophe Copéret,Antonio Togni,Alexey Fedorov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hlca.202000035
2020-04-01
Helvetica Chimica Acta
Abstract:A high throughput experimentation (HTE) study identified active Ru metathesis catalysts and reaction conditions for the ethenolysis of maleate esters to the respective acrylate esters. Catalysts were tested at various loadings (75–10'000 ppm) and temperatures (30–60 o C) with maleate esters dissolved in toluene (up to ca. 44 wt%) or neat and at variable partial pressures of ethylene (0.2–10 bar). Ruthenium catalysts containing a PCy 3 ligand, such as 1 st or 2 nd generation Grubbs catalysts, as well as the state‐of‐the‐art catalysts containing cyclic alkyl amino carbene (CAAC) ligands, are generally inferior to Hoveyda‐Grubbs 2 nd generation catalyst in ethenolysis of maleates. Productive turnover numbers could exceed 1900 if the ethenolysis reaction is performed at low ethylene pressures (0.2‐3 bar) and reach 5200 when a polymeric phenol additive was used. Such catalytic performance falls well within the window practiced in industry. Moreover, a crude technoeconomic analysis finds similar production cost for both the ethenolysis route and conventional technology, i.e. propene oxidation followed by esterification, justifying research to further improve the ethenolysis route.
chemistry, multidisciplinary
What problem does this paper attempt to address?