When Free 'Drug-Interaction Checker Mobile Apps' Ensure Interaction Free Medications for ICU Patients in Resource Limited Setups

Jahidul Hasan,Raihan Rabbani,Sitesh C. Bachar,Md. Jahidul Hasan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3362464
2019-01-01
SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract:Polypharmacy prescriptions increase the risk of drug-drug interactions (DIs) including potential drug-drug interactions (PDI) leading to alteration of drugs' therapeutic responses and occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Critical care pharmacists (CCP) are the key responsible persons for monitoring DIs and PDIs, and drug-interaction checker mobile apps (DICMA) are the most useful tool. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of CCP interventions in monitoring the DIs/PDIs in ICU-patients of a resource limited setup by using free DICMA. This retrospective study was conducted in a hospital in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Without having any paid DICMA, CCP of that ICU used the free DICMA: 'Medscape' and 'Epocrates' to check DIs frequently in every prescription, CCP suggested to doctors and prescriptions were modified, accordingly. Those suggestions were collected from the hospital data archive and the satisfaction level of CCP to DICMA was measured. CCP worked on 2,967 critical patients, 11,128 DIs were detected, 3,932 PDIs were identified and suggested to doctors. In every patient, 1.77 (on average) PDIs were calculated. Prescriptions containing 6 to 10 medications and above 10 medications, the number of available DIs were 3.28 and 7.53, respectively; and the number of PDIs were 1.42 and 4.7, respectively. Doctors accepted 95.85% of total PDIs suggestions (n= 3,932) and 30.41% of those PDIs suggestions yielded immediate positive responses in patients. The satisfaction level of CCP in using free DICMA was 4 (on a scale of 5). Most of the resource limited setups are unable to provide a paid DICMA to its CCP for monitoring DIs. Free DICMA can be an alternative solution for CCP to safe the critical patients from serious DIs, PDIs and ADRs through frequently screening the prescriptions, easily and cost-effectively.Funding Statement: The authors state: "No external funding source for this study."Declaration of Interests: The authors declare: "No conflicts of interest."Ethics Approval Statement: The ethical approval for this study was taken on March, 2017 from the hospital ethical committee.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?