The Correlation Analysis of Baseline Serum CA199, CEA and CA125 in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Guochao Deng,Huan Yan,Zhipeng Guo,Guanghai Dai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-18126/v1
2020-03-20
Abstract:Abstract Background:CA199, CEA and CA125 were the most widely used tumor markers in pancreatic cancer. However, the studies associated with the relationship between the three markers and pancreatic cancer were limited. This study aimed to explore the correlation between baseline serum CA199, CEA, CA125 levels and clinical characteristics in pancreatic cancer. Methods:278 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer received first-line chemotherapy treatments enrolled in this research. Correlated analysis between tumor markers and disease characteristics was performed by Pearson’s Chi-squared test or Fisher exact test. We used Pearson’s correlation test to investigate the relationship between tumor markers and peripheral blood parameters. Univariate analysis was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis and HR calculation was determined by the Cox regression model. Results: Baseline CA199, CEA, and CA125 both positively associated with the primary tumor site (p=0.007; p=0.012; p=0.003, respectively);liver metastasis (p=0.001; p=0.001; p=0.028, respectively); number of organ metastasis (p=0.001; p=0.008;p=0.042, respectively); baseline WBC levels (p<0.001; p<0.001; p<0.001, respectively), LDH levels (p<0.001; p=0.004; p<0.001, respectively). And CA199 also correlated with years of smoking(p=0.024); diabetes and year of diabetes (p=0.012; p=0.012); baseline glycemic levels (p=0.004). CA199 and CA125 levels had the relationship with baseline neutrophil counts (p<0.001; p<0.001, respectively). Years of smoking, baseline neutrophil counts, LDH levels, CA199 levels and CA125 levels were independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: Combinations of the four factors were also correlated with survival. It’s concluded that CA199, CEA, CA125 correlated with multi-factors of clinical factors. And combinations of baseline neutrophil counts, LDH levels, CA199 levels and CA125 levels were also prognostic factor.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?