Evolving epidemiology of poliovirus serotype 2 following withdrawal of the serotype 2 oral poliovirus vaccine

G. R. Macklin,K. M. O’Reilly,N. C. Grassly,W. J. Edmunds,O. Mach,R. Santhana Gopala Krishnan,A. Voorman,J. F. Vertefeuille,J. Abdelwahab,N. Gumede,A. Goel,S. Sosler,J. Sever,A. S. Bandyopadhyay,M. A. Pallansch,R. Nandy,P. Mkanda,O. M. Diop,R. W. Sutter
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aba1238
IF: 56.9
2020-04-24
Science
Abstract:A public health catch-22 In 2016, the serotype 2 component of the oral poliovirus vaccine given to children was withdrawn. This measure was taken to prevent vaccine-associated disease outbreaks caused by mutation in the live attenuated vaccine. Children around the world now have poor immunity to serotype 2 poliovirus because the inactivated vaccine is far less effective and a new oral vaccine is not yet ready. Using a statistical model, Macklin et al. discovered that most current outbreaks of polio in several countries across Asia and sub-Saharan Africa are likely associated with the serotype 2 vaccine strain (see the Perspective by Donlan and Petri). To block transmission when poliovirus outbreaks occur requires deployment of the only tool in the box: the existing live attenuated serotype 2 oral vaccine, which increases the risk of vaccine-derived disease. Science , this issue p. 401 ; see also p. 362
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?