Abstract:While carbon pricing is widely seen as a crucial element of climate policy and has been implemented in many countries, it also has met with strong resistance. We provide a comprehensive overview of public perceptions of the fairness of carbon pricing and how these affect policy acceptability. To this end, we review evidence from empirical studies on how individuals judge personal, distributional and procedural aspects of carbon taxes and cap-and-trade. In addition, we examine preferences for particular redistributive and other uses of revenues generated by carbon pricing and their role in instrument acceptability. Our results indicate a high concern over distributional effects, particularly in relation to policy impacts on poor people, in turn reducing policy acceptability. In addition, people show little trust in the capacities of governments to put the revenues of carbon pricing to good use. Somewhat surprisingly, most studies do not indicate clear public preferences for using revenues to ensure fairer policy outcomes, notably by reducing its regressive effects. Instead, many people prefer using revenues for 'environmental projects' of various kinds. We end by providing recommendations for improving public acceptability of carbon pricing. One suggestion to increase policy acceptability is combining the redistribution of revenue to vulnerable groups with the funding for environmental projects, such as on renewable energy.Key policy insights If people perceive carbon pricing instruments as fair, this increases policy acceptability and support.People's satisfaction with information provided by the government about the policy instrument increases acceptability.While people express high concern over uneven distribution of the policy burden, they often prefer using carbon pricing revenues for environmental projects instead of compensation for inequitable outcomes.Recent studies find that people's preferences shift to using revenues for making policy fairer if they better understand the functioning of carbon pricing, notably that relatively high prices of CO2-intensive goods and services reduce their consumption.Combining the redistribution of revenue to support both vulnerable groups and environmental projects, such as on renewable energy, seems to most increase policy acceptability.

Individual Factors Influencing Acceptability for Environmental Policies: A Review and Research Agenda

Acceptability of policies targeting dietary behaviours and physical activity: a systematic review of tools and outcomes

Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior?

Perceived fairness and public acceptability of carbon pricing: a review of the literature

Empirical Research of Public Acceptance on Environmental Tax: A Systematic Literature Review

On the Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Literature Review and Guide for the Empirical Economist

The Role of Perceived Justice, Political Ideology, and Individual or Collective Framing in Support for Environmental Policies

When perceived fairness and acceptance go hand in hand–Drivers of regulatory and economic policies for low-carbon mobility

Examining the Factors That Contribute to Pro-Environmental Behaviour between Rural and Urban Populations

Choosing the right policy: Factors influencing the preferences of consumption-side personal carbon reduction policies

Environmental Attitude in the 28 Member States of the European Union: Cross-Cultural Comparisons Grounded in Incommensurable Measurement Instruments

Citizen attitudes towards the environment and association with perceived threats to the countryside: Evidence from countries in five European biogeographic zones

Exploring the psychological antecedents of private and public sphere behaviours to reduce household plastic consumption

The Relationship Between Consumer Behaviour, Attitudes and Acceptance of Public Policy Tools Advancing Sustainable Food Consumption

Exploring External Factors Affecting the Intention-Behavior Gap When Trying to Adopt a Sustainable Diet: A Think Aloud Study

Behavioral barriers impede pro-environmental decision-making: Experimental evidence from incentivized laboratory and vignette studies

The Environmental Psychology of the Ecological Citizen: Comparing Competing Models of Pro‐Environmental Behavior*

Social policy, public investment or the environment? Exploring variation in individual-level preferences on long-term policies

Drivers of Pro-Ecological Behaviour Norms among Environmentalists, Hunters and the General Public

Gender and Socioeconomic Influences on Ten Pro-Environmental Behavior Intentions: A German Comparative Study