Abstract:Purpose – This paper aims at investigating the multifaceted nature of innovation networks by focusing on two research questions: Do cluster actors exchange only one type of innovation-related knowledge? Do cluster actors play different roles in innovation-related knowledge exchange? Design/methodology/approach – This paper builds on data collected at the firm level in an Italian aerospace cluster, that is a technology-intensive industry where innovation is at the base of local competitiveness. A questionnaire was used to collect both attribute data and relational data concerning collaboration and the flows of knowledge in innovation networks. The authors distinguished among three types of knowledge (technological, managerial and market knowledge) and five types of brokerage roles (coordinator, gatekeeper, liaison, representative and consultant). Data analysis relied on social network analysis techniques and software. Findings – Concerning the first research question, the findings show that different types of knowledge flow in different ways in innovation networks. The different types of knowledge are unevenly exchanged. The exchange of technological knowledge is open to everyone in the cluster. The exchange of market and managerial knowledge is selective. Concerning the second research question, the authors suggest that different types of cluster actors (large firms, small- and medium-sized enterprises, research centers and universities and institutions for collaboration) do play different roles in innovation networks, especially with reference to the three types of knowledge considered in this study. Research limitations/implications – The present paper has some limitations. First of all, the analysis focuses on just one cluster (one industry in one specific location), cross- and comparative analyses with other clusters may illuminate the findings better, eliminating industry and geographical biases. Second, the paper focuses only on innovation-related knowledge exchanges within the cluster and not across it. Practical implications – The results have practical implications both for policy makers and for managers. First, this research stresses how innovation often originates from a combination of different knowledge types acquired through the collaboration with heterogeneous cluster actors. Further, the analysis of brokerage roles in innovation-driven collaborations may help policy makers in designing programs for knowledge-transfer partnerships among the various actors of a cluster. Social implications – The paper suggests a clear need of developing professional figures capable of operating at the interface of different knowledge domains. Originality/value – The data illuminate several aspects of how innovation takes place in a cluster opening up intriguing aspects that have been overlooked by extant literature. The authors believe that this may trigger several lines of further research on the topic.

Assessing the Collaboration and Network Additionality of Innovation Policies: A Counterfactual Approach to the French Cluster Policy

Evaluating the indirect effects of cluster-based innovation policies: the case of the Technological Research Institutes in France

Micro-behaviors and structural properties of knowledge networks: toward a ‘one size fits one’ cluster policy

Simulating Micro Behaviours and Structural Properties of Knowledge Networks: Toward a 'One Size Fits One' Cluster Policy

Innovation and informal knowledge exchanges between firms

Cognitive Proximity, Technological Regime and Knowledge Accumulation: an Agent-Based Model of Interfirm Knowledge Exchange

Industrial innovation: Direct evidence from a cluster-oriented policy

Collaborative knowledge networks emergence for innovation: Factors of success analysis and comparison

Synergistic effects and the co-existence of networks in clusters

Why do we need to complement the European Union Regional Innovation Scoreboard with a cluster-neural network tool for what-if policy analysis?

International R&D Collaboration Networks

Leading Firms’ Network and Innovation in Corporate Clusters

Innovation in Clusters: a Study by Structural Determinants

Clusters, industrial policy and firm strategy

Knowledge exchanges in innovation networks: evidences from an Italian aerospace cluster

The role of firm R&D effort and collaboration as mediating drivers of innovation policy effectiveness

Study of The Relationship Between Public and Private Venture Capitalists in France: A Qualitative Approach

Knowledge exchange and innovation in clusters: a dynamic social network analysis

Are firms in clusters really more innovative?

Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study

Potentials for Reducing Spatial Inequalities in Innovation: A Spatial Econometric Perspective