Abstract:Training monitoring is about keeping track of what athletes accomplish in training, for the purpose of improving the interaction between coach and athlete. Over history there have been several basic schemes of training monitoring. In the earliest days training monitoring was about observing the athlete during standard workouts. However, difficulty in standardizing the conditions of training made this process unreliable. With the advent of interval training, monitoring became more systematic. However, imprecision in the measurement of heart rate (HR) evolved interval training toward index workouts, where the main monitored parameter was average time required to complete index workouts. These measures of training load focused on the external training load, what the athlete could actually do. With the advent of interest from the scientific community, the development of the concept of metabolic thresholds and the possibility of trackside measurement of HR, lactate, VO 2 , and power output, there was greater interest in the internal training load, allowing better titration of training loads in athletes of differing ability. These methods show much promise but often require laboratory testing for calibration and tend to produce too much information, in too slow a time frame, to be optimally useful to coaches. The advent of the TRIMP concept by Banister suggested a strategy to combine intensity and duration elements of training into a single index concept, training load. Although the original TRIMP concept was mathematically complex, the development of the session RPE and similar low-tech methods has demonstrated a way to evaluate training load, along with derived variables, in a simple, responsive way. Recently, there has been interest in using wearable sensors to provide high-resolution data of the external training load. These methods are promising, but problems relative to information overload and turnaround time to coaches remain to be solved.

Training monitoring methods used in the field by coaches and practitioners: A systematic review

Monitoring Training Load to Understand Fatigue in Athletes

Athlete monitoring perspectives of sports coaches and support staff: A scoping review

Training Monitoring

Training monitoring in professional Australian football: theoretical basis and recommendations for coaches and scientists

The Fine-Tuning Approach for Training Monitoring.

Monitoring the athlete training response: subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures: a systematic review

Monitoring Training Loads: The Past, the Present, and the Future

Training Load Monitoring Practices Used by Strength and Conditioning Coaches in Hurling, Gaelic Football, Camogie, and Ladies Gaelic Football

The Current State of Subjective Training Load Monitoring: Follow-Up and Future Directions

The Current State of Subjective Training Load Monitoring—a Practical Perspective and Call to Action

Methods for Regulating and Monitoring Resistance Training

Modern Techniques and Technologies Applied to Training and Performance Monitoring

Training Monitoring for Resistance Exercise: Theory and Applications

Measuring Training Load in Sports

Does education improve adherence to a training monitoring program in recreational athletes?

Training Load Monitoring Considerations for Female Gaelic Team Sports: From Theory to Practice

Monitoring Readiness to Train and Perform in Female Football: Current Evidence and Recommendations for Practitioners

Training Monitoring in Sports: It Is Time to Embrace Cognitive Demand

More than metrics: The role of socio-environmental factors in determining the success of athlete monitoring

Practitioner Usage, Applications, and Understanding of Wearable GPS and Accelerometer Technology in Team Sports