Abstract:Purpose Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores are becoming increasingly relevant in academic literature and the corporate world. This is partly because the themes covered by ESG scores are intended to resolve multiple major social and environmental issues. However, there is little consensus among academics about the definition of ESG scores and their measures. Many scholars have used ESG scores to represent various issues. The purpose of this study is to gather all definitions that were used by scholar when using ESG scores in their research. Design/methodology/approach This systematic literature review aims to identify how ESG scores are presented in the academic literature. A total of 4,145 articles were identified, of which 342 articles from influential peer-reviewed journals were retained. Findings In the articles, five different thematic definitions emerged in terms of how scholars have used ESG scores in their research: sustainability, corporate social responsibility, disclosure, finance and the analysis of ESG scores. Although some definitions are consistent with the methodologies of the agencies that produce ESG scores, others raise further questions. Caution is required when using ESG scores as a metric. They represent financial adjusted risk-return for some and are used to express business sustainability for others. Research limitations/implications Only top-ranked journals were analyzed. In addition, only the key terms "ESG Score" and "ESG Scores" were used to gather all research papers. Practical implications Researchers could improve the accuracy of their results by developing specific methodologies that are closely related to the issues intended to be measured. The underlying variables composing the ESG scores could be used instead of the final score for more accurate environmental or social issues measurements. Originality/value This research shows that scholars use ESG scores to represent multiple issues that are not always captured by ESG scores' official methodologies. ESG scores can express the overall performance of environmental and social issues, but they cannot be used to track specific underlying issues.

Measurement concerns and agreement of environmental social governance ratings

ESG rating disagreement: Implications and aggregation approaches

Aggregate Confusion: The Divergence of ESG Ratings

Implications Of ESG Rating for Sustainable Development

The influence of market and institutional factors on ESG rating disagreement

Why is Corporate Virtue in the Eye of The Beholder? The Case of ESG Ratings

Comparative Analysis of ESG Information Disclosures

Squaring the Circle, or a Quantified Rating of ESG Reports

ESG Indicators as Organizational Performance Goals: Do Rating Agencies Encourage a Holistic Approach?

Unpacking Environmental, Social, and Governance Score Disparity: A Study of Indonesian Palm Oil Companies

A systematic literature review of socially responsible investment and environmental social governance metrics

Divergences among ESG rating systems: Evidence from financial indexes

An Empirical Analysis on Performance Inconsistency among Environmental, Social and Governance Components of ESG Ratings

Take it with a pinch of salt-ESG rating of stocks and stock indices

Quantitative ESG disclosure and divergence of ESG ratings

The use of ESG scores in academic literature: a systematic literature review

Does Voluntary ESG Reporting Resolve Disagreement among ESG Rating Agencies?

Navigating the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) landscape: constructing a robust and reliable scoring engine - insights into Data Source Selection, Indicator Determination, Weighting and Aggregation Techniques, and Validation Processes for Comprehensive ESG Scoring Systems

An Analysis of the Influence of ESG Rating Divergence on Investor Sentiment

The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review

Are environmental, social and governance (ESG) ratings reliable indicators of emissions outcomes? A case study of the airline industry