Abstract:Are risks social constructions of different societal actors that can be checked at best against standards of consistency, cohesion and internal conventions of deduction, but cannot claim any validity outside of the actor's logical framework? Or are technical estimates of risk representations of real hazards that can and will affect people as predicted by the statistical values, regardless of the beliefs or convictions of those who conduct the assessments? Which of the two sides one takes determines the legitimate function of risk perception for management purposes. The paper argues that both extremes, the constructivist and the realist perspective, miss the point, as risks are always mental representations of threats that are capable of claiming real losses. Over the last two decades, risk analysts have dealt with both sides of risk in an additive fashion. In times in which risk management has been under serious pressure to demonstrate effectiveness and cost-efficiency, the parallel approach of pleasing the technical elite and the public alike has lost legitimacy. In order to integrate risk assessment and perception, the paper analyses the strengths and weaknesses of each approach to risk analysis and highlights the potential contributions that the technical sciences and the social sciences can offer to risk management. Technical assessments provide the best estimate for judging the average probability of an adverse effect linked to an object or activity. First, public perception should govern the selection of criteria on which acceptability or tolerability are to be judged. Second, public input is needed to determine the trade-offs between criteria. Third, public preferences are needed to design resilient strategies for coping with remaining uncertainties. A public participation model is introduced that promises an integration of analytic knowledge and deliberative process involving those who will be affected by the respective risk.

Perceived Risk: Further Considerations for the Marketing Discipline

Risk Perception: Reflections on 40 Years of Research

A role for consumer risk perceptions in grocery retailing

Beyond the Privacy Paradox: Objective versus Relative Risk in Privacy Decision Making

Gender Differences in Risk Perception: Theoretical and Methodological erspectives

An integrative framework for mapping the psychological landscape of risk perception

The role of risk perception for risk management

Examination of Brand Knowledge, Perceived Risk and Consumers' Intention to Adopt an Online Retailer

Consumer perceptions of risk and uncertainty and the implications for behaviour towards innovative retail services: The case of Internet Banking

Comparative studies of risk perception: a review of twenty years of research

Does perceived risk influence the effects of message framing? Revisiting the link between prospect theory and message framing

Perceived Risk and Its Impact on Customer Intention to Online Shopping Based-on Different Products

The Impact of Perceived Risk on Consumers' Cross-Platform Buying Behavior

Risk perception and the media

Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality

Risk Perception: Experts and the Public

Perceived Risk and Consumer Decision-Making—The Case of Telephone Shopping

How Consideration of Future Consequences, Prior Gain or Loss, Personal Risk Profile, and Justification Affect Risk–Payoff Preferences

Risk Perception And Risky Choice: Situational, Informational And Dispositional Effects

Path Analysis Using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to Examine the Moderation of Product Knowledge in the Effects of and Perceived Risk, Environmental Consciousness, and Subjective Norm on Purchase Intention

The influence of perceived risk on food supplement consumption intention