Identifying degradation patterns of lithium ion batteries from impedance spectroscopy using machine learning

Yunwei Zhang,Qiaochu Tang,Yao Zhang,Jiabin Wang,Ulrich Stimming,Alpha A. Lee
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15235-7
IF: 16.6
2020-04-06
Nature Communications
Abstract:Abstract Forecasting the state of health and remaining useful life of Li-ion batteries is an unsolved challenge that limits technologies such as consumer electronics and electric vehicles. Here, we build an accurate battery forecasting system by combining electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)—a real-time, non-invasive and information-rich measurement that is hitherto underused in battery diagnosis—with Gaussian process machine learning. Over 20,000 EIS spectra of commercial Li-ion batteries are collected at different states of health, states of charge and temperatures—the largest dataset to our knowledge of its kind. Our Gaussian process model takes the entire spectrum as input, without further feature engineering, and automatically determines which spectral features predict degradation. Our model accurately predicts the remaining useful life, even without complete knowledge of past operating conditions of the battery. Our results demonstrate the value of EIS signals in battery management systems.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the unsolved problem of predicting the state of health (SoH) and remaining useful life (RUL) of lithium - ion batteries. Accurately predicting the SoH and RUL of batteries is crucial for technologies such as consumer electronics and electric vehicles. It can inform users when they need to replace the battery and avoid unexpected capacity degradation. In addition, battery prediction is also very important for expanding the recycling industry, which can help facilities decide whether to recycle batteries as scrap metal or use them for less - demanding "secondary applications". ### Main problems: 1. **Predicting battery state of health and remaining useful life**: Traditional battery prediction methods rely on modeling microscopic degradation mechanisms (such as the growth of the solid - electrolyte interphase, lithium plating, active material loss, etc.), but these methods are difficult to scale and are complex. Therefore, researchers have turned to data - driven methods. 2. **Challenges in data - driven methods**: The main challenge lies in defining a set of physically meaningful input features and constructing a robust statistical model. Commonly used input features are those extracted from charge - discharge curves, but the amount of information in these features is limited. 3. **Application of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS)**: EIS is a real - time, non - invasive measurement method that can provide rich information, covering all material properties, interface phenomena, and electrochemical reactions. However, due to the high - dimensional nature of the EIS spectrum, it is very challenging to extract quantitative features from it and correlate them with degradation. ### Solutions: This paper solves the above problems by combining electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and Gaussian process regression (GPR). Specifically: - **Dataset construction**: More than 20,000 EIS spectra of commercial lithium - ion batteries under different states of health, states of charge, and temperatures were collected, which is the largest among similar datasets to date. - **Model construction**: The GPR model is used to directly take the entire EIS spectrum as input without additional feature engineering, and automatically determine which spectral features can predict degradation. - **Result verification**: The model can accurately predict the remaining useful life of the battery, even without a complete understanding of the battery's past operating conditions. Experimental results show that the EIS signal has high value in battery management systems. ### Key formulas: - Joint distribution of Gaussian process regression: \[ \begin{pmatrix} Y \\ y^* \end{pmatrix} \sim \mathcal{N} \left( \mathbf{0}, \begin{pmatrix} K(X, X)+\sigma^2 I & K(X, x^*) \\ K(x^*, X) & K(x^*, x^*) \end{pmatrix} \right) \] - Predictive mean: \[ \mu_{y^*}=K(x^*, X)(K(X, X)+\sigma^2 I)^{-1}Y \] - Predictive variance: \[ \Delta^2 = K(x^*, x^*) - K(x^*, X)(K(X, X)+\sigma^2 I)^{-1}K(X, x^*) \] - ARD squared - exponential kernel function: \[ k_{\text{ARD - SE}}(x_i, x_j)=\sigma_f^2\exp \left( -\frac{1}{2}\sum_{m = 1}^d \left( \frac{x_{im}-x_{jm}}{\sigma_m} \right)^2 \right) \] Through this method, the paper demonstrates the potential value of the EIS signal in battery management system design and proves the effectiveness of the GPR model in identifying important features.