Tortuosity and anatomy of supra-aortic trunks in aortic reconstruction
范伟健,王博,陈波,林学广,谭晋韵,童进东,汤敬东,史伟浩,余波
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn101411-20220113-00005
2022-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To provide data reference for endovascular treatment strategy selection and device development for aortic arch disease and branches reconstruction through measuring anatomical baseline data of aorta arch and supra-aortic trunks (SATs) by multi-detector row spiral CT angiography(CTA).Methods:The baseline and complete CTA image data of 500 patients without aortic arch disease were consecutively collected from Pudong Hospital of Fudan University and Huashan Hospital of Fudan University from August 2021 to November 2021. The images were reconstructed by Mimics 10.0 software, and the anatomical parameters of aorta arch and SATs were recorded and analyzed.Results:The types of aorta arch were 53.8% (269/500) for type Ⅰ, 29.8% (149/500) for type Ⅱ, and 16.4% (82/500) for type Ⅲ. SATs types included 454 cases (91.8%) of standard type, 41 (8.2%) bovine arch and 5 (1.0%) isolated left vertebral artery (ILVA). Diameter of innominate artery (IA), left common carotid artery (LCCA), and left subclavian artery (LSCA) were (15.28±4.84) mm, (9.69±3.13) mm and (11.86±3.54) mm, respectively. Distances between IA-LCCA, LCCA-LSCA and LSCA-left vertebral artery (LVA) were (5.69±3.64) mm, (10.56±6.30) mm and (39.40±16.80) mm, respectively. Angle between LCCA, LSCA and tangent line of aorta arch were (52.98±21.29)°and (59.83±25.49)°, respectively. Angle between LCCA, LSCA and sagittal midline of aorta arch were (13.89±9.52)°and (13.30±8.88)°, respectively. Among them, 69 patients (13.8%) had distances between LCCA-LSCA<5mm; 33 patients (6.6%) had distances between LSCA-LVA<25mm; 6 patients (1.2%) showed angle between LSCA and sagittal midline of aorta arch ≥45°, and 129 patients (25.8%) showed angle between LSCA and tangent line of aorta arch ≤45°. According to the subgroup analysis of age and gender, no significant correlation was found between age and diameter and distance of SATs, while anatomical data of SATs in males were significantly higher than those in females, and the differences in diameter [IA:(15.39±4.66)mm
vs (13.98±4.51)mm;LCCA:(9.97±3.27)mm
vs (8.55±2.69)mm;LSCA:(12.26±3.35)mm
vs (10.66±3.16)mm] and distance [IA-LCCA:(6.15±3.95)mm
vs (5.11±3.45)mm;LCCA-LSCA:(10.58±5.80)mm
vs (9.63±6.28)mm] were statistically significant (all
P>0.05).
Conclusion:Through obtaining parameters range of aorta arch and SATs based on results of CTA, the heterogeneity of SATs and its correlation with age and gender could be better understand. By doing so, it would provide evidence for strategy selection for endovascular aortic repair as well as SATs reconstruction, and design of branched stent graft.