Feasibility of a deep learning algorithm to distinguish large cell neuroendocrine from small cell lung carcinoma in cytology specimens

Daniel Gonzalez,Robin L. Dietz,Liron Pantanowitz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cyt.12829
2020-05-20
Cytopathology
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Introduction</h3><p>Distinguishing small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) from large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) in cytology is challenging. Our aim was to design a deep learning algorithm for classifying high‐grade neuroendocrine carcinomas in fine‐needle aspirations (FNA).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Materials and Methods</h3><p>Archival cytology cases of high‐grade neuroendocrine carcinoma (17 small cell, 13 large cell, 10 mixed/unclassifiable) were retrieved. Each case included smears (Diff‐Quik and Pap stains) and cell block or concomitant core biopsies (H&amp;E stain). All slides (N=114) were scanned at 40x magnification, randomized and split into training (11 large, 9 small) and test (2 large, 8 small, 10 mixed) groups. Tumor was annotated using QuPath and exported as JPEG image tiles. Three distinct deep learning convolutional neural networks, one for each preparation/stain, were designed to classify each tile and provide an overall diagnosis for each slide.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>The H&amp;E‐trained algorithm correctly classified 7/8 (87.5%) SCLC cases and 2/2 (100%) LCNEC cases. The Pap stain algorithm correctly classified 6/7 (85.7%) SCNEC and 1/1 (100%) LCNEC cases. The algorithm trained on Diff‐Quik stained images correctly classified 7/8 (87.5%) SCLC and 1/1 (100%) LCNEC cases.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>Using open source software it was feasible to design a deep learning algorithm to distinguish between SCLC and LCNEC. The algorithm showed high precision in distinguishing between these two categories on H&amp;E sectioned material and direct smears. Although the dataset was limited, our deep learning models show promising results in the classification of LCNEC and SCLC. Additional work using a larger dataset is necessary to improve the algorithm's performance.</p></section>
pathology,cell biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?