Study on the differences in water vapour characteristics and predictive signals of low‐frequency precipitation in the pre‐flood season of South China between flood and drought years

Liping Li,Chenyu Ma,Chunyan Yang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.6600
2020-04-24
International Journal of Climatology
Abstract:Using 753 station's precipitation daily data in China and NCEP/NCAR daily reanalysis data from 1980 to 2017, the lead–lag correlations between 10‐20‐d low‐frequency (LF) precipitation and LF water vapor transport are comparatively analyzed in the pre‐flood season of South China during typical flood and drought years, and verified using Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) backward trajectory model. The same features during both the flood and drought years include that, 1)the primary LF water vapor sources are the south side of Lake Baikal, the northern Sea of Japan and the Yellow Sea, the South China Sea and the western Pacific Ocean. 2)The key LF water vapor circulation systems are the Lake Baikal anticyclone (LBAC), the Northeast China cyclone (NECC), the Philippine Sea anticyclone (PSAC) and the South China cyclone (SCC). The different features between the flood and drought years include that,1)the southern Sea of Japan is another water vapor source and the Australia anticyclone (AAC) is another key LF water vapor circulation system in the flood years. 2)There are two southwest warm water vapor flows and one southeast cross‐equatorial water vapor flow in the flood years, while there is only one southwest warm water vapor flow in the drought years. In addition, most of notable predictive signals start appearing at approximately −4 d in both the flood and drought years. However, there is a difference in the time of occurrence of similar predictive signals, and some predictive signals only appear in the flood years.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
meteorology & atmospheric sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?