Abstract:IntroductionOne of the body fluids often used in metabolomics studies is urine. The concentrations of metabolites in urine are affected by hydration status of an individual, resulting in dilution differences. This requires therefore normalization of the data to correct for such differences. Two normalization techniques are commonly applied to urine samples prior to their further statistical analysis. First, AUC normalization aims to normalize a group of signals with peaks by standardizing the area under the curve (AUC) within a sample to the median, mean or any other proper representation of the amount of dilution. The second approach uses specific end-product metabolites such as creatinine and all intensities within a sample are expressed relative to the creatinine intensity.ObjectivesAnother way of looking at urine metabolomics data is by realizing that the ratios between peak intensities are the information-carrying features. This opens up possibilities to use another class of data analysis techniques designed to deal with such ratios: compositional data analysis. The aim of this paper is to develop PARAFAC modeling of three-way urine metabolomics data in the context of compositional data analysis and compare this with standard normalization techniques.MethodsIn the compositional data analysis approach, special coordinate systems are defined to deal with the ratio problem. In essence, it comes down to using other distance measures than the Euclidian Distance that is used in the conventional analysis of metabolomic data.ResultsWe illustrate using this type of approach in combination with three-way methods (i.e. PARAFAC) of a longitudinal urine metabolomics study and two simulations. In both cases, the advantage of the compositional approach is established in terms of improved interpretability of the scores and loadings of the PARAFAC model.ConclusionFor urine metabolomics studies, we advocate the use of compositional data analysis approaches. They are easy to use, well established and proof to give reliable results.

Data normalization strategies in metabolomics: Current challenges, approaches, and tools

A Novel Bioinformatics Approach to Identify the Consistently Well-Performing Normalization Strategy for Current Metabolomic Studies

Analytical challenges of untargeted GC-MS-based metabolomics and the critical issues in selecting the data processing strategy

Evaluation of normalization strategies for GC-based metabolomics

Performance Evaluation and Online Realization of Data-driven Normalization Methods Used in LC/MS based Untargeted Metabolomics Analysis

Data standards can boost metabolomics research, and if there is a will, there is a way

Individualized metabolomics: opportunities and challenges

Advances in mass spectrometry for metabolomics: Strategies, challenges, and innovations in disease biomarker discovery

Metabolomics in the field of biomedical research

Metabonomics: a useful tool for the future surgeon

Towards Standardization of Data Normalization Strategies to Improve Urinary Metabolomics Studies by GC×GC-TOFMS

Current approaches and outstanding challenges of functional annotation of metabolites: a comprehensive review

Metabolomic analysis of urine samples by UHPLC-QTOF-MS: Impact of normalization strategies

Statistical Methods and Workflow for Analyzing Human Metabolomics Data

Evaluation of statistical techniques to normalize mass spectrometry-based urinary metabolomics data

Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics: a guide for annotation, quantification and best reporting practices

Network-based strategies in metabolomics data analysis and interpretation: from molecular networking to biological interpretation

Bioinformatics Tools for Mass Spectroscopy-Based Metabolomic Data Processing and Analysis

Navigating common pitfalls in metabolite identification and metabolomics bioinformatics

RobNorm: Model-Based Robust Normalization Method for Labeled Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Data.

Normalization techniques for PARAFAC modeling of urine metabolomic data