Abstract:China successfully attracted massive inflows of foreign direct investment since the beginning of its open door policy in the late 1970s. Recently however, this trend has been reversed and China itself became a major supplier of FDI for other parts of the world. This development is part of a larger strategy termed The Go Global Policy- officially adopted in the tenth five-year plan and creating a host of OFDI-friendly policies for Chinese enterprises. While China primarily invests into other developing and emerging economies, it also slowly emerges as an investor in developed markets- a development furthered by its massive holdings of foreign reserves. In particular Germany has developed into one of the primary locations attracting Chinese OFDI. While extensive attention has been devoted to Chinese OFDI flows to developing countries, little is known about its activities in developed markets like Germany. This case study based research paper concludes that Chinese FDI to Germany is largely limited to urban- and industrial clusters. While M&A in industrial clusters is the fastest growing entrance strategy for the Chinese, the takeover process is increasingly welcomed by German companies seeking to be taken over for own strategic reasons. The Chinese capacity to preprocess at low prices, access to the Chinese market and supply with funds are all key factors in shaping such a consensus- based M&A. However, as European governance provides for a variety of social and governmental stakeholders, the investment process is also highly regulated. Given a loophole on European level, the federal Republic has been able to extend its capabilities to direct and impinge upon Chinese FDI across all sectors. As this potential for regulation is largely not employed in practice, conflict between social and governmental stakeholders becomes increasingly likely, as unions already point to malpractice and violations by Chinese investors. Furthermore, hollow Chinese investments on municipal level may cause a general bias towards OFDI from China, which will make approval of future projects unlikely.

Assessing the EU Framework Regulation for the Screening of Foreign Direct Investment—What Is the Effect on Chinese Investors?

The Application of Regulation 452/2019 in Response to Chinese Foreign Direct Investment

Towards A New Legal Framework for Eu-China Investment Relations

Protection of Foreign Investment in China: The Foreign Investment Law and the Changing Landscape

Chinese Investments in the European Energy Sector: From Merger Control to Investment Screening

Factors Analysis about FDI Scale and Entry Modes in China

Changing Mechanism of the National Security Review for Foreign Investment – A Perspective from the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act

The ‘Golden Power’ on Foreign Investments in EU Law in the Light of Covid Crisis

China’s Foreign Investment Encouraged Catalogue and Negative Lists as a Tool of Foreign Direct Investment Attraction

Foreign Direct Investment Restrictions: Legal Aspects in the Context of Eurasian Integration

Chinese Foreign Direct Investment in the EU

China’s regulatory framework for outward foreign direct investment

Economic Integration via Novel Investment Agreements: CAI’s Focus on Market Access vis-à-vis the Current Bilateral Investment Treaties Between China and European Union Member States

China’s New Foreign Investment Law and Its Contribution Towards the Country’s Development Goals

Chinese investments abroad: examining the spillover effects in Eastern and Central Europe

National Treatment for Foreign Investment in China: A Changing Landscape

Chinese foreign direct investment to Germany

National security and the international regime of foreign direct investment: modern challenges and prospects

National security and FDI policy ambiguity: A commentary

Foreign Investment, Strategic Assets and National Security (Table of Contents)

Analysing the EU's collective securitisation moves towards China