Comparison of Quinone‐Based Catholytes for Aqueous Redox Flow Batteries and Demonstration of Long‐Term Stability with Tetrasubstituted Quinones

James B. Gerken,Colin W. Anson,Yuliya Preger,Peter G. Symons,J. David Genders,Yang Qiu,Wenzhen Li,Thatcher W. Root,Shannon S. Stahl
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202000340
IF: 27.8
2020-04-15
Advanced Energy Materials
Abstract:<p>Quinones are appealing targets as organic charge carriers for aqueous redox flow batteries (RFBs), but their utility continues to be constrained by limited stability under operating conditions. The present study evaluates the stability of a series of water‐soluble quinones, with redox potentials ranging from 605–885 mV versus NHE, under acidic aqueous conditions (1 <span class="smallCaps">m</span> H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub>). Four of the quinones are examined as cathodic electrolytes in an aqueous RFB, paired with anthraquinone‐2,7‐disulfonate as the anodic electrolyte. The RFB data complement other solution stability tests and show that the most stable electrolyte is a tetrasubstituted quinone containing four sulfonated thioether substituents. The results highlight the importance of substituting all C–H positions of the quinone in order to maximize the quinone stability and set the stage for design of improved organic electrolytes for aqueous RFBs.</p>
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,physics, applied, condensed matter,energy & fuels
What problem does this paper attempt to address?