Clinical efficacy analysis of minimally invasive intramedullary nailing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures combined with radial nerve injury
S-Y Shi,X-L Du,X-H Ou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_202401_34891
Abstract:Objective: The aim of this study was to research the therapeutic effectiveness of radial nerve damage paired with a humeral shaft fracture and intramedullary nailing. Patients and methods: Retrospective research was performed on the medical records of 58 individuals who had humeral shaft fractures and radial nerve injuries. The admission period was between June 1, 2020, and June 31, 2022. All study subjects that satisfied the requirements for inclusion were separated, using the random number table approach, into two groups: one for internal fixation (group N), which included 29 cases, and one for minimally invasive procedures (group W), which included 29 patients. Group W received minimally invasive intramedullary nail treatment, and group N received internal fixation with compression plates. The changes in the clinical effects, surgery-related indicators, joint function, nerve function, and levels of stress indicators of the two groups of treatment were analyzed. The changes in adverse reactions and satisfaction of patients were compared. Results: The effective rate of group W was 89.66% (26/29), and that of group N was 72.41% (21/29). Although group W's effective rate was higher than group N's, there was no discernible disparity between the two groups (p>0.05). Surgical blood loss and incision length were much smaller in group W than in group N, and overall operation duration and length of stay were considerably shorter in group W than in group N (p<0.05). The excellent and good rate of elbow joint function in group W was 93.10% (27/29), whereas the excellent and good rate of group N was 65.52% (19/29). The excellent and good rate of elbow joint function in group W was considerably greater than that of group N (p<0.05). In group W, the excellent and good rate of shoulder joint was 96.55% (28/29), and that in group N was 68.97% (20/29), and group W had a considerably greater probability of excellent shoulder joint function than group N (p<0.05); the excellent and good rate of neurological function was 82.76% (24/29) in group W and 58.62% (17/29) in group N, and group W had much greater rates of excellent and good neurological function than group N (p<0.05). prostaglandin E-2 (PGE2), C-reactive protein (CRP) and Substance P (SP) levels in the W group and the N group were substantially higher after the surgery than they were prior to it (p<0.05), and in the W group, the aforementioned stress markers were much lower than they were in the N group (p<0.05). Group W experienced a 3.45% (1/29) rate of adverse events, while group N saw a 24.14% (7/29) incidence. The incidence of adverse responses was substantially lower in group W than in group N (p<0.05). The contentment rate of group W was 93.10% (27/29), and that of group N was 72.41% (21/29). Group W had a much greater contentment percentage than group N (p<0.05). Conclusions: Minimally invasive intramedullary nailing is a successful therapeutic approach for humeral shaft fractures with radial nerve damage, which may successfully enhance patients' shoulder and elbow joint function and nerve function, reduce patients' stress response, and has the characteristics of minimal adverse responses and high contentment, which is worthy of popularization and deployment.