Abstract:Corporate environmental and social reporting lacks the comparability across companies that is a characteristic of financial information. To address this weakness, Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) created analytical frameworks to measure the quality and scope of reporting relating to three focus areas: climate change, water and children’s rights. By translating information published by a global set of companies into standardized data, NBIM has constructed a dataset that can be used for analyzing and comparing companies across time and within sectors. The purpose of this project is to understand the value relevance of NBIM’s dataset. First, we model the determinants of the disclosure scores and climate change performance score. Consistent with prior literature, we find that firms that are larger, higher growth, less closely held and with higher analyst coverage tend to disclose more. We find that the climate change performance score is less a function of observable firm characteristics and is more idiosyncratic. This highlights the different dynamics of measures that capture actual performance, versus metrics that capture disclosures of efforts. Next, we take the ‘residual’ scores – the part of the scores that is uncorrelated with observable firm characteristics, industry and country membership – and test for associations with future financial performance. Across all of our models, the residual disclosure score is not robustly correlated with any metric of future financial performance. However, we find that the residual component of the climate change performance score is significantly related to future financial performance. We find even stronger associations for the subset of firms that have above median exposure to climate change risks. We perform supplementary analysis to understand the motivation behind these disclosures. We find that some firms choose to disclose more because they are currently facing more problems, as measured by the level of negative media attention that the firm receives on the focal issue. We also find that firms disclosing more in the past received more negative media attention on that focal issue in the future. These results hold after controlling for factors, such as firm size, that influence both media attention and disclosure levels. This suggests that higher disclosure around an issue is not necessarily indicative of better current or future performance on the issue but in some cases, it is a signal of future bad news. Conversely, we find a negative relation between the climate change performance score and the current level of negative media attention, suggesting that this performance measure indeed captures meaningful efforts to manage climate-related risks.

Does corporate investment efficiency affect corporate disclosure practices?

Pushing a balloon: does corporate risk disclosure matter for investment efficiency?

Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Disclosures: An Alternative Explanation for Increased Disclosure

ESG disclosure practices and financial performance: a general and sector analysis of SP-500 non-financial companies and the moderating effect of economic conditions

Does the Provision of Voluntary Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Influence the Cost of Equity Capital? Evidence from Australia and the United Kingdom

Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Quality and Firms' Investment Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

Does CSR Information Disclosure Improve Investment Efficiency? The Moderating Role of Analyst Attention

Mandatory vs. Voluntary ESG Disclosure, Efficiency, and Real Effects

Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure and Value Generation: Is the Financial Industry Different?

Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting

Does Capital Expenditure Matter for ESG Disclosure? A UK Perspective

Environmental transparency and investors' risk perception: Cross‐country evidence on multinational corporations' sustainability practices and cost of equity

Impact of ESG disclosure and financial reporting quality on investment efficiency

IS THE CHINESE CORPORATE VOLUNTARY DISCLOSURE EFFICIENT

Corporate disclosure and firm value: do audit quality and foreign listing matter?

Stock Performance and Intermediation Changes Surrounding Sustained Increases in Disclosure

Audit quality, media coverage, environmental, social, and governance disclosure and firm investment efficiency

Is corporate disclosure of environmental performance indicators reliable or biased information? A look at the underlying drivers

A Novel Metric for Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Its Impact on Investment Inefficiency

The Value Relevance of Corporate Sustainability Disclosures: An Analysis of a Dataset from One Large Asset Owner