Combination of KRAS and SMAD4 mutations in formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissues as a biomarker for pancreatic cancer

Takahiro Yokose,Minoru Kitago,Sachiko Matsuda,Yasushi Sasaki,Yohei Masugi,Yuki Nakamura,Masahiro Shinoda,Hiroshi Yagi,Yuta Abe,Go Oshima,Shutaro Hori,Fujita Yusuke,Yutaka Nakano,Yutaka Endo,Kodai Abe,Takashi Tokino,Yuko Kitagawa
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cas.14425
IF: 5.7
2020-05-30
Cancer Science
Abstract:<p>Formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded (FFPE) tissues used for routine pathological diagnosis are valuable for cancer genomic analysis; however, the association between mutation status derived from these specimens and prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains unclear. We analyzed 50 cancer‐related gene mutations including driver genes in PDAC, using next‐generation sequencing (NGS) to clarify the association between gene mutations and prognosis. DNA was extracted from FFPE tissues obtained from 74 patients with untreated resectable PDAC who underwent surgery at our institution between 2013 and 2018. Fifty of the 74 patients with DNA extracts from FFPE samples suitable for NGS, were analyzed. The prevalence of driver gene mutations was as follows: 84% for <i>KRAS</i>, 62% for <i>TP53</i>, 32% for <i>SMAD4</i>, and 18% for <i>CDKN2A</i>. There were no cases of single <i>SMAD4</i> mutations; its rate of coincidence with <i>KRAS</i> or <i>TP53</i> mutations was 30% and 2%, respectively. The combination of <i>KRAS</i> and <i>SMAD4</i> mutations resulted in significantly shorter relapse‐free survival (RFS; median survival time (MST): 12.3 vs. 28.9 months, P = 0.014) and overall survival (OS; MST: 22.3 months vs. not reached, P = 0.048). On multivariate analysis, the combination of <i>KRAS</i> and <i>SMAD4</i> mutations was an independent prognostic factor for RFS (hazard ratio (HR) 4.218; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.77–10.08; P = 0.001) and OS (HR 6.730; 95% CI 1.93–23.43; P = 0.003). The combination of <i>KRAS</i> and <i>SMAD4</i> mutations in DNA obtained from FFPE tissues is an independent poor prognostic factor in PDAC.</p>
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?