Treatment of infantile spasms: why do we know so little?

Nicola Specchio,Nicola Pietrafusa,Alessandro Ferretti,Luca De Palma,Marta Elena Santarone,Chiara Pepi,Marina Trivisano,Federico Vigevano,Paolo Curatolo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2020.1759423
IF: 4.287
2020-06-02
Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics
Abstract:Infantile spasm (IS) is an epileptic syndrome with typical onset within the first 2 years of life. This condition might be caused by several etiologies. IS is associated with pathological neuronal networks; however, definite hypotheses on neurobiological processes are awaited.Changes in NMDA and GABA<sub>B</sub> receptors and increase of Ca<sup>2+</sup> conductance are some of the possible pathophysiological mechanisms. Animal models can help, but most have only some features of IS. Outcome is strongly affected by etiology and the timing of treatment, which relies still on ACTH, oral steroids, and vigabatrin. No significant differences in terms of efficacy have been documented, though a combination of ACTH and vigabatrin seems to be associated with better long-term outcomes. Despite the increasing knowledge about the etiology and pathophysiology of IS, in the last years, no new treatment approaches have been recognized to be able to modify the neurobiological process underlying IS. Precision medicine has far to come in IS.Recently, no new therapeutic options for IS have emerged, probably due to the lack of reliable animal models and to the extreme variability in etiologies. Consequently, the outlook for patients and families is poor and early recognition and intervention remain research priorities.
pharmacology & pharmacy,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?