Abstract:The study of the role played by the autocracy of the late Imperial period in the history of Russia is relevant because it enables to understand the factors of its viability and its loss. Of considerable interest for the study of this topic are the judgments of contemporaries who knew the main political characters of that time, the goals and motives of their activities, domestic political circumstances. The novelty of the work lies in analysing the ideas of a liberal, a member of the Central Committee of the Cadet Party V.A. Maklakov, he gave a characteristics for the potential and weaknesses of the autocracy at the beginning of the XX century. The purpose of the study is to interpret the representations of V.A. Maklakov about the autocracy’s responsibility for solving the problem of building relationships with the public, about the struggle of traditional and new forces in the Russian bureaucracy of the early XX century, the goals of their activities, their perception of autocracy, their attitude to the constitutional monarchy. Materials and methods of the study. The sources on the topic are the texts of V.A. Maklakov: a recording of a lecture that he delivered in 1909 at Tinishevsky College, memoirs written in exile, legislative acts, and memoirs of contemporaries. The theoretical basis of the research is the theory of modernization, which characterizes the process of a traditional system’s transformation into a modern one; an axiological approach that focuses on the study of the value system; a civilizational concept that substantiates the idea of the people developing their cultural identity. Study results. Maklakov characterized autocracy in the context of the ideas of legality and the right of the individual to freedom and self-determination. The Russian autocracy cared about the greatness of Russia, but the power of the monarch was not limited by laws. The idea of legality was present in the official ideology of the XIX – early XX century. Maklakov argued that the higher bureaucracy prevented the principle of legality from taking root in the country’s governance system. In the top leadership of the country, Maklakov singled out the “old” forces that defended the autocracy, and the “healthy elements” that solved promising national tasks of Russia’s development, they contributed to the transformation of an unlimited monarchy into a constitutional monarchy, defended the idea of interaction between the government and the society. Conclusions. The autocracy proclaimed the principle of legality, but did not seek self-restraint by the constitution. The “historical power” was put on the path of constitutional development by statesmen who understood their duty to Russia. They sought to rely on liberal social forces, but the cadets did not support their program. According to Maklakov, after publishing the Manifest on October 17, 1905 and the Basic Laws of 1906, the Russian autocracy took the form of a “liberal autocracy”, since it was limited by the constitution, which created the mechanism for interaction between the government and the State Duma. Nicholas II made no further attempts to regain unlimited autocracy.

ЕКАТЕРИНА ВЕЛИКАЯ И ДИАЛЕКТИКА ПРОСВЕЩЕННОЙ МОНАРХИИ

IDEAS OF V.A. MAKLAKOV ON THE RUSSIAN AUTOCRACY IN THE LATE IMPERIAL PERIOD

Features of the political regime of Russia

EVOLUTION OF CULTURE IN RUSSIA: FROM HISTORY TO MODERNITY THROUGH THE PRESS OF THE UNIVERSAL SPIRIT

Legal enlightenment in Russia: modern problems of theory and practice

The Evolution of A. Durer's Aesthetic views in the Context of Renaissance Philosophy

Administrative legal relationship: evolution of views on the concept and essence

Dialectics of Tradition and Modernization in the Constitutional Development of Russia

Publishing and literature sale in Russian and foreign languages as a means of modernization of Russia in the first quarter of the 18th century

POLITICAL AND IDEOLOGICAL DOMINANTS OF A. MAKARENKO: RETURN TO THE DISCUSSION TOPIC

Freedom and Control: the Dual Variation of Russia Higher Education

The Problem of Choosing the Path of Development of Russia in the Philosophy of Westerners and Slavophiles in the 19th Century

Russian education faults

Modern features and trends in the development of the Russian state (constitutional and legal aspect)

The Problem of Cultural Studies Development in Russia in the Aspect of the Dialectics of Absolute Spirit

Modern Dangers in the Development of the Russian Education System and Ways to Overcome Them: Socio-Philosophical Analysis

The experience of teaching national history and the foundations of constitutional knowledge in the late 1930s early 1940s (using the example of railway schools in the Kursk region)

The essence of religious and moral upbringing in modern education

The Varangian Issue through the Prism of the Social Contract Concept

PROBLEMS OF WESTERNIZATION OF THE CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN POLITICAL CULTURE