The role for offshore wind power in renewable hydrogen production
Cheng Cheng,Llewelyn Hughes
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136223
IF: 11.1
2023-02-01
Journal of Cleaner Production
Abstract:The offshore wind sector is growing rapidly globally, with the Asia Pacific expected to replace Europe as the largest region in terms of cumulative installations in the coming decade (GWEC, 2022). The growth in offshore wind in the Asia Pacific region is supported by policies implemented by governments in the People's Republic of China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, and Vietnam. Governments have also announced mid-term targets designed to provide certainty to companies considering investing in the sector (IRENA, 2021a) (see Fig. 7). In addition to enabling the decarbonization of electricity, offshore wind has the potential to support the production of renewable hydrogen (Dinh et al., 2021; Franco et al., 2021; Lucas et al., 2022; Ibrahim et al., 2022). Hydrogen produced from renewable electricity via electrolysis is an option for decarbonizing sectors that cannot be directly electrified (IEA, 2021; Singlitico et al., 2021). Offshore wind is being considered in Denmark and Germany as an input into hydrogen production (Stori, 2021). In the United Kingdom, Aker Offshore Wind, Aker Clean Hydrogen, and DNV have proposed large scale grid connected projects combining floating offshore wind capacity with a refinery that produces ammonia, liquid hydrogen, and synthetic fuels (Buljan, 2021). At least eleven dedicated floating offshore wind platforms for hydrogen production are under consideration or development globally (Ibrahim et al., 2022). A number of studies investigate the potential to combine offshore wind with hydrogen production, with an emphasis on evaluating the profit or net present value of costs and revenues of different configurations and strategies for hybrid offshore wind–hydrogen systems. A common feature of studies that optimize the system for maximum profitability is the inclusion of hydrogen as an energy storage option enabling the utilization of curtailed electricity from offshore wind. Hou et al. (2017), for example, examine the potential to couple offshore wind farms with hydrogen infrastructure in Denmark, finding the most profitable configuration is to produce hydrogen when the electricity price is low or negative, and then sell the hydrogen to end users. Dinh et al. (2021) present a model for an off-grid system in which hydrogen is produced from dedicated offshore wind farms. Their model calculates both net present value and discounted payback to enable an assessment of system viability. In a case study for Ireland, they find a dedicated offshore wind–hydrogen system would be profitable at a hydrogen price of €5/kg, with 2–45 days of underground hydrogen storage. Bonacina et al. (2022) consider liquified hydrogen production and storage for use in the shipping sector, finding a dedicated offshore wind-hydrogen production and storage facility is economically viable for use in the Mediterranean. Another approach is to model hybrid offshore wind–hydrogen systems, with the objective of minimizing the cost of hydrogen production or, in the presence of fuel cells, the cost of electricity. Schnuelle et al. (2020), for example, model hydrogen production from both onshore and offshore wind farms, as well as solar farms in Germany. They find that the shape of transient power input signals has a large impact on system performance, and the lowest cost for hydrogen is achieved with onshore wind and alkaline electrolysis. Janssen et al. (2022) model the cost of hydrogen production through off-grid solar PV, onshore wind and offshore wind in 30 European countries, finding onshore wind is lower cost than solar PV and offshore wind in terms of producing hydrogen as an individual system, while a hybrid solar PV–onshore wind system results in the lowest cost of hydrogen overall. A challenge when considering the potential for offshore wind to contribute to renewable hydrogen production is that cost assumptions are crucial to identifying the economics of hydrogen production, but have high uncertainties, with. This is particularly important for sources of electricity generation, as the Levelized Cost of Hydrogen (LCOH) is sensitive to the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) used in producing hydrogen (Franco et al., 2021). This is recognised by Hou et al. (2017), who note their finding that "selling hydrogen directly to end users is more profitable than selling hydrogen-generated electricity to the grid at high electricity prices" may change if future prices fluctuate. Scolaro and Kittner (2022) also state in their sensitivity analysis that "the cost of electricity from the offshore wind farm plays a primary role in the outcome of the analysis". To date research has also commonly focused geographically on Europe, where offshore wind is a technology option due to relatively weak solar resources and limited land availability. In this context, offshore wind can substitute for solar PV or onshore wind as an alternative source of renewable electricity. Howeve -Abstract Truncated-
environmental sciences,green & sustainable science & technology,engineering, environmental