Abstract:The article deals with examining the EU main approaches on crisis management and conflict prevention on the example of the Eastern Partnership countries, internal and external factors that affect implementation of the EU activities in Eastern Europe and South Caucasus, implications for the EU and the region. The EU has a unique experience of activities in all crisis phases: early warning, mediation, deployment of EU missions and operations in conflict areas, post-conflict peacebuilding (stabilisation, reconstruction and reconciliation). The EU’s comprehensive and integrated approach towards crisis management includes a package of mixed political-military measures with focus on civilian component of the Common Foreign and Security Policy. The strategic autonomy outlined as the guideline in the EU Global Strategy 2016 is an impetus for the EU more active and distinct role as a security actor, for enhancing its institutional and operational capabilities in the area of crisis regulation. Though there is a lack of EU capacity as a security provider in case of protracted conflicts in Eastern partner countries. The EU has sought to avoid direct involvement in conflict settlement: there aren’t any efficient mechanisms of it within the European Neighborhood Policy and Eastern Partnership initiative. The determining factors of the EU’s approach to conflict resolution in Easter Europe are: absence of direct military threats and less challenges comparing to Southern and Eastern Mediterranean region; lack of political will and unity, multi-vector member-states’ policy; external influence of other actors, mainly Russia, unwillingness of the EU member-states to be engaged in geopolitical tensions with it. The regional security deficit requires more active and efficient EU engagement as a security provider in settling the protracted conflicts. The relevant measures should be: establishment of security compact within the Eastern Partnership initiative, deployment of additional missions in the region, coordination of activities with the OSCE, US and NATO.

Not on speaking terms, but business as usual: the ambiguous coexistence of conflict and cooperation in EU–Russia relations

The different faces of power in European Union–Russia relations

Reformatting the EU–Russia Pseudo-Partnership: What a Difference a Crisis Makes

Russia’s Policies in the Post-Soviet Space: Between Constructive Relations and Fighting the New Cold War

Two futures: EU-Russia relations in the context of Ukraine.

Impact of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict on the International Situation in Russia

The EU energy security relations with Russia until the Ukraine war

Reluctant allies: system-unit dynamics and China-Russia relations

Navigating the Legacy of Westphalia: The European Union’s Role in Managing Russian-Ukrainian Relations

EUROPEAN UNITY AND SOLIDARITY IN THE FACE OF THREATS POSED BY RUSSIA'S MILITARY POLICY

The Study on Energy Cooperation and Conflict between Russia and the EU

THE EU’S APPROACH TO CONFLICT RESOLUTION: IMPLICATIONS FOR EASTERN PARTNERSHIP COUNTRIES

Weaponizing narrative: Russia contesting EUrope’s liberal identity, power and hegemony

Theoretical rigor and the study of contemporary cases: explaining post-cold war China–Russia relations

The Russia-Ukraine conflict as a discursive continuum: A comparative study of Business Today and New York Times using an extended corpus-based discourse-historical approach

THE EUROPEAN MIRROR OF HYBRID WAR: HOW RUSSIA TRIES TO DESTABILIZE THE EUROPEAN COUNTRIES

Russia’s role in regional cooperation and the EU Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region (EUSBSR)

Belt & Road initiative and Russia: From mistrust towards cooperation

Undermining, defusing or defending European integration? Assessing public communication of European executives in times of EU politicisation

MODERN RUSSIAN-GERMAN RELATIONS IN THE CONTEXT OF ALTERNATIVE THEORIES OF GLOBALIZATION

Perceptions of the EU’s Role in the Ukraine-Russia and the Israel-Palestine Conflicts: A Biased Mediator?