Abstract:The article is devoted to the analysis of the communicative transformation of the image of Russia in the American media after the annexation of Crimea to the Russian Federation in 2014. The relevance of the study is due to the increasing role of information warfare in the context of globalization and technology development, as well as the significance of the Crimean events as a turning point in Russian-American relations. The theoretical significance of the work lies in deepening the understanding of the role of communicative processes in international relations and their influence on the formation of the image of the state. The practical significance is related to the possibility of applying the results to analyze and predict the development of relations between Russia and the United States. The novelty of the research is due to a comprehensive approach to the analysis of the transformation of the image of Russia, taking into account not only political and sociological, but also linguistic aspects. The empirical base of the study was made up of a corpus of texts from leading American print publications and transcripts of TV channels for the period from the 2000s to December 2014 with a total volume of about 200 thousand word usage. The paper uses a method of qualitative text analysis aimed at identifying the dominant narratives, metaphors, stylistic techniques and communicative strategies of the representation of Russia. The article shows that before the Ukrainian crisis, the coverage of Russia in the American media was characterized by a relative balance, including both critical and positive assessments. However, after the annexation of Crimea, there was a sharp negation of the image of Russia in the US media discourse, associated with the use of such discursive strategies as destructivization, demonization, archaization, personification of the "Russian threat" in the person of Vladimir Putin, securitization of the actions of the Russian Federation and embedding the Crimean events in the context of global ideological confrontation between Russia and the West. This transformation was carried out using a wide range of linguistic means, including negatively colored vocabulary, metaphors, allusions, and historical analogies. The result of the communicative transformation was the consolidation in the American media discourse of the stereotypical image of Russia as an authoritarian aggressor power, disregarding the norms of international law and posing a threat to the world order.

Harnessing protest potential: Russian strategic culture and the colored revolutions

Theory of strategic culture: An analytical framework for Russian cyber threat perception

From Moscow with coercion: Russian deterrence theory and strategic culture

The geopolitical origins of Russian strategic culture and its enlightenment in China

Weaponizing narrative: Russia contesting EUrope’s liberal identity, power and hegemony

State-society relations and the sources of support for the Putin regime: bridging political culture and social contract theory

The ‘KGB State’ and Russian Political and Foreign Policy Culture

The Communicative Transformation of the Image of Russia in the Us Media after the Annexation of Crimea

Bound to Interpret: Russia, NATO, and the Military-Political Crises in the Post-Cold War Order

National interests as the basis for “revisionism” on the international arena in the context of National Security Strategies of Ukraine, United States, and Russia

Traditional values, family, homeschooling: The role of Russia and the Russian Orthodox Church in transnational moral conservative networks and their efforts at reshaping human rights

Right Wing Populist Civic Movements: Western Experience and the Situation in Russia

Understanding Putin: The politics of identity and geopolitics in Russian foreign policy discourse

History Done Right: War and the Dynamics of Triumphalism in Contemporary Russian Culture

Influence of geopolitical and informational confrontations on Russian state policy

Fighting Empire, Weaponising Culture: The Conflict with Russia and the Restrictions on Russian Mass Culture in Post-Maidan Ukraine

Russia’s Strategic Communication During the Ukraine Crisis (2013–2014): Victims, Hypocrites, and Radicals

On the Triple-interest Appeal of the US-instigated “Color Revolution” in CIS Region——Concurrently on the Urgency of China-Russian Resistance of “Color Revolution” within the SCO Framework

The Adaptive Strategies of Anti-Kremlin Digital Dissent in Telegram during the Russian Invasion of Ukraine

History Rhymes Itself: U.S. Public Diplomacy as a Tool for “Political Warfare”

Mobilization potential of the Russian state and society