Abstract:Purpose The authors aim to develop and test a theory of dual responsibility to explain the relationship between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and firm performance. The authors empirically examine whether firms that meet their economic and social responsibilities simultaneously perform better than firms that fail to do so. In doing so, the authors theoretically extend and empirically test Barney's (2018) call to incorporate the stakeholder perspective with resource-based view (RBV). The authors also examine the moderating effects of firm status on this relationship. Design/methodology/approach The authors use a longitudinal panel sample of 137 S&P 500 firms and data for the years between 2004 and 2013 collected from multiple data sources. The authors use stochastic frontiers analysis to measure firm capabilities in the areas of R&D, operations and marketing. These capability measures are then used along with CSR measures and a measure of firm status to test the hypotheses of this study. The authors also conducted several robustness checks and various supplementary analyses using different econometrics techniques and different operationalizations of the key variables of interests. Findings The results show that firm CSR is positively related to firm performance and that the effect of CSR on performance is stronger for firms with higher levels of R&D capability and operational capability. The authors also find support for the three-way interaction between CSR, economic responsibility and firm status, suggesting that firms high in both social and economic responsibilities and status will enjoy the highest levels of performance. Research limitations/implications The findings of this study are based on large, publicly listed firms in North America. Therefore, their generalizability to other contexts and other types of firms require additional research. The reliance on KLD measures is also a limitation, especially because they have not reported CSR ratings after 2013. Practical implications For practicing managers, the main implication of this study is that an optimal balance between market and nonmarket strategies is key for superior performance. Social implications The continued debate regarding the firm's purpose can be understood by focusing equally on the two main responsibilities of firms: nonsocial responsibility and social responsibility toward all stakeholders. Originality/value The study answers the call to incorporate stakeholder theory into the RBV of the firm by highlighting the critical role of firm capabilities in the relationship between CSR and performance. The study also highlights the role that firm status plays in the relationship between market and nonmarket strategies and firm performance.

Responsible leadership and triple-bottom-line performance—do corporate reputation and innovation mediate this relationship?

Does What Goes Around Really Comes Around? the Mediating Effect of CSR on the Relationship Between Transformational Leadership and Employee’s Job Performance in Law Firms

The Impact Of Transformational Leadership On Job Performance And Csr As Mediator In Smes

Exploring the mediating role of environmental strategy, green innovations, and transformational leadership: the impact of corporate social responsibility on environmental performance

Responsible leadership, organizational ethical culture, strategic posture, and green innovation

The Role of Transformational Leadership on Firm Performance: Mediating Effect of Corporate Sustainability and Moderating Effect of Knowledge-Sharing

The influence of renewable energy, humanistic culture, and green knowledge on corporate social responsibility and corporate environmental performance

The impact of corporate social responsibility on customer loyalty: The mediating role of corporate reputation, customer satisfaction, and trust

Toward a new understanding of environmental and financial performance through corporate social responsibility, green innovation, and sustainable development

Corporate Social Responsibility and its Nexus with Firm Performance and Institutional Ownership: An Emerging Market Context

Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: a theory of dual responsibility

Does corporate social responsibility drive financial performance? Exploring the significance of green innovation, green dynamic capabilities, and perceived environmental volatility

Perceived corporate social responsibility, ethical leadership, and moral reflectiveness impact on pro-environmental behavior among employees of small and medium enterprises: A double-mediation model

Responsible leadership and workplace deviant behaviour: modelling trust and turnover intention as mediator

Exploring the Relationship Between Corporate Social Responsibility, Trust, Corporate Reputation, and Brand Equity

Impact of corporate social responsibility on sustainable competitive advantages: The mediating role of corporate reputation

The Moderating Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in the Association of Internal Corporate Governance and Profitability; Evidence from Pakistan

Does corporate reputation play a mediating role in the association between manufacturing companies' corporate social responsibility (CSR) and financial performance?

The Impact of Corporate Culture on Corporate Social Responsibility: Role of Reputation and Corporate Sustainability

The relationship between green transformational leadership, corporate social responsibility, and task performance

Corporate social responsibility and financial performance – the role of corporate reputation, advertising and competition