Abstract:Background: Association among generalized ligamentous laxity (GLL), hip microinstability, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) after hip arthroscopy has yet to be completely established. Purposes: (1) To report minimum 2-year PROs in patients with GLL who underwent hip arthroscopy in the setting of symptomatic labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and (2) to compare clinical results with a matched-pair control group without GLL. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Data from a prospectively collected database were retrospectively reviewed between August 2014 and December 2016. Patients were considered eligible if they received primary arthroscopic treatment for symptomatic labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement. Inclusion criteria included preoperative and minimum 2-year follow-up scores for the following PROs: modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Non-arthritic Hip Score (NAHS), and visual analog scale for pain (VAS). From the sample population, 2 groups were created: the GLL group (Beighton score ≥4) and the control group (Beighton score <4). Patients were matched in a 1:2 ratio via propensity score matching according to age, sex, body mass index, Tönnis grade, and preoperative lateral center-edge angle. Patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for mHHS, Hip Outcome Score–Sports Specific Scale (HOS-SSS), and International Hip Outcome Tool–12 (iHOT-12) were calculated. Results: A total of 57 patients with GLL were matched to 88 control patients. Age, sex, body mass index, and follow-up times were not different between groups ( P > .05). Preoperative radiographic measurements demonstrated no difference between groups. Intraoperative findings and procedures between groups were similar except for capsular treatment, with the GLL group receiving a greater percentage of capsular plications ( P = .04). At minimum 2-year follow-up, both groups showed significant improvement in PROs and VAS ( P .05). Moreover, groups reached comparable rates of MCID and PASS for mHHS, HOS-SSS, and iHOT-12. Conclusion: Patients with GLL after hip arthroscopy for symptomatic femoroacetabular impingement and labral tears may expect favorable outcomes with appropriate labral and capsular management at minimum 2-year follow-up. When compared with a pair-matched control group without GLL, results were comparable for mHHS, NAHS, HOS-SSS, and VAS and reached PASS and/or MCID for mHHS, HOS-SSS, and iHOT-12.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper aims to solve the problem of evaluating the clinical effect of hip arthroscopy when it is carried out in the presence of Generalized Ligamentous Laxity (GLL). Specifically, there are two research objectives: 1. **Report Patient - Reported Outcomes (PROs) for at least 2 years**: For patients with symptomatic acetabular labral tears and Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAI) accompanied by Generalized Ligamentous Laxity, the changes in PROs within at least 2 years after hip arthroscopy. 2. **Compare clinical results with the control group**: By the method of propensity score matching, compare patients with Generalized Ligamentous Laxity with control group patients without Generalized Ligamentous Laxity, and evaluate the differences in clinical results between the two groups. ### Background The relationship between Generalized Ligamentous Laxity, hip micro - instability and Patient - Reported Outcomes has not been fully established. Hip micro - instability refers to the hip joint movement beyond the physiological range due to bone defects or soft tissue injuries, which may lead to pain and dysfunction. ### Research Design - **Research type**: Cohort study; Evidence level 3. - **Methods**: The study reviewed the data collected from August 2014 to December 2016. Inclusion criteria included: patients with symptomatic labral tears and Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome who received initial hip arthroscopy treatment, and had preoperative and at least 2 - year follow - up PROs data (such as modified Harris Hip Score, Non - Arthritis Hip Score, Visual Analogue Scale pain score, etc.). According to age, gender, body mass index, Tönnis grade and preoperative lateral center - edge angle, by the method of propensity score matching, patients with Generalized Ligamentous Laxity (Beighton score ≥ 4) were matched with control group patients (Beighton score < 4) in a ratio of 1:2. ### Results - **Patient characteristics**: A total of 57 patients with Generalized Ligamentous Laxity were successfully matched with 88 control group patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, gender, body mass index and follow - up time. - **Surgical results**: In the follow - up of at least 2 years after the operation, both groups of patients had significant improvements in PROs and VAS scores (P < 0.001). There was also no significant difference in the postoperative PROs improvement range (Δ value) between the two groups (P > 0.05). - **Clinical indicators**: The two groups of patients reached similar levels in the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and patient - acceptable symptom state (PASS) of mHHS, HOS - SSS and iHOT - 12. ### Conclusion After receiving hip arthroscopy treatment for symptomatic Femoroacetabular Impingement and labral tears, patients with Generalized Ligamentous Laxity can obtain good follow - up outcomes for at least 2 years through appropriate labral and joint capsule management. Compared with the paired control group without Generalized Ligamentous Laxity, the results of the two groups in mHHS, NAHS, HOS - SSS and VAS are similar, and they have reached PASS and/or MCID. ### Keywords Hip arthroscopy; Ligamentous laxity; Femoroacetabular impingement; Patient - reported outcomes; Micro - instability Through these research objectives and results, this paper fills the research gap on the long - term prognosis of patients with Generalized Ligamentous Laxity after hip arthroscopy, and provides an important reference basis for clinical decision - making.

Achieving Successful Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in the Setting of Generalized Ligamentous Laxity With Labral Preservation and Appropriate Capsular Management: A Propensity Matched Controlled Study

Outcomes of Isolated Endoscopic Gluteal Tendon Repair Compared With Concomitant Endoscopic Gluteal Tendon Repair and Arthroscopic Hip Labral Repair: A Propensity-Matched Analysis With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Mid- to Long-Term Outcomes in Patients After Hip Arthroscopy With Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review

Long-term Outcomes of Primary Hip Arthroscopy: Multicenter Analysis at Minimum 10-Year Follow-up With Attention to Labral and Capsular Management

Ten-Year Outcomes in Patients Aged 40 Years and Older After Primary Arthroscopic Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement With Labral Repair

Return to Sport and Athletic Function in an Active Population After Primary Arthroscopic Labral Reconstruction of the Hip

Comparison of Pain Scores and Functional Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Hip Labral Repair and Concomitant Capsular Repair or Plication Versus No Closure

Patients Undergoing Revision Hip Arthroscopy With Labral Reconstruction or Labral Repair and Patient-Reported Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Two-Year Outcomes of Primary Arthroscopic Surgery in Patients with Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Comparative Study of Labral Repair and Labral Reconstruction

Outcomes After Arthroscopic Hip Labral Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Borderline Dysplastic Female Patients With Painful Internal Snapping Improve Clinical Outcomes At Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up Following Hip Arthroscopy With Femoroplasty, Labral Repair, Iliopsoas Fractional Lengthening, and Capsular Plication: A Propensity-Matched Controlled Comparison

Borderline Dysplasia After Primary Hip Arthroscopy with Capsular Plication and Labral Preservation: Ten-Year Survivorship and Patient-Reported Outcomes

Association Between Severity of Chondrolabral Junction Breakdown and Functional Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Acetabular Labral Tears

Capsular Repair Versus No Repair After Hip Arthroscopy in Patients Without Dysplasia or Generalized Ligamentous Laxity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Outcomes of Flexibility Sport Athletes With Borderline Hip Dysplasia After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Propensity-Matched Analysis at Minimum 2-Year Follow-up

Association Between Chondrolabral Junction Breakdown and Conversion to Total Hip Arthroplasty After Hip Arthroscopy for Symptomatic Labral Tears: Minimum 8-Year Follow-up

Outcome Scores and Survivorship of Patients Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy With Borderline Hip Dysplasia: A Propensity-Matched Study With Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

Establishing Clinically Significant Improvement for Patients After Arthroscopic Surgery for Shoulder Instability With Large Labral Tears

Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Chondrolabral Refixation, Osteochondroplasty, and Routine Capsular Closure for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Clinical Outcomes at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

Patients With Concomitant Painful External Snapping Hip and Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndromes Reported Complete Snapping Resolution With Release of the Gluteus Maximus and Iliotibial Band, and Comparable Minimum 2-Year Outcomes to a Propensity-Matched Control Group

Noninterportal capsulotomy of hip arthroscopy showed improved outcomes in borderline hip dysplasia: A retrospective study with minimum 2‐year follow‐up