Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

Quality of governance and political support in China, Japan, and South Korea

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

Structure Hypothesis of Authoritarian Rule: Evidence from the Lifespans of China's Dynasties

Public Goods And Regime Support In Urban China

Constructed Hierarchical Government Trust in China: Formation Mechanism and Political Effects

Generating Regime Support in Contemporary China

Political Trust, Political Performance, and Support for Democracy

New Agenda for the Study of Chinese Governance

Citizens’ support for economic governance approaches in contemporary China

The Level and Sources of Popular Support for China's Current Political Regime

Explaining Regime Strength in China

Perceived social fairness and trust in government serially mediate the effect of governance quality on subjective well-being

Global economic influence and domestic regime support: evidence from China

Ecopolitical discourse: Authoritarianism or democracy? - Evidence from China

Citizens' Satisfaction with Government Performance in Six Asian-Pacific Giants

Government Governance And Political Trust In Transition China: An Empirical Analysis

When Authoritarianism Responds: Conditional Government Responsiveness in China's Environmental Conflicts

Governance and public administration in China

Governance Performance and Political Trust in Transitional China:From “Economic Growth Legitimacy” to “Public Goods Legitimacy”

How Does Context Affect Self-Governance? Examining Ostrom'S Design Principles In China

Before the Emergence of Critical Citizens: Economic Development and Political Trust in China