Cross-cultural equivalence of shortened versions of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire: An application of the alignment method

Matthew J.W. McLarnon,Emanuel F. Romero
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2020.110074
IF: 3.95
2020-09-01
Personality and Individual Differences
Abstract:A common question asked by researchers involved with large-scale, cross-cultural investigations is 'how can comparisons of personality factor scores (or other individual difference variables) be facilitated across many different countries?' Guided by this question, we examined the structure and function of two shortened versions of the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (Colledani, Anselmi, & Robusto, 2019; Francis, Brown, & Philipchalk, 1992) using the data from Eysenck and Barrett (2013), which includes responses from over 43,000 individuals from 35 different countries. We leveraged the cutting-edge factor alignment method, which allowed us to gain comprehensive and nuanced insight into the cross-cultural measurement invariance of the EPQ's extraversion, psychoticism, neuroticism, and lie scales. Crucially, we found that observed scores would have weak comparability across countries had alignment not been applied. Together, our findings underscore several critical implications for researchers and practitioners, and suggest a number of future research initiatives.
psychology, social
What problem does this paper attempt to address?