Abstract:Abstract Background We aimed to determine if composite structural measures of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) progression on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can predict the radiographic onset of accelerated knee osteoarthritis. Methods We used data from a nested case-control study among participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative without radiographic KOA at baseline. Participants were separated into three groups based on radiographic disease progression over 4 years: 1) accelerated (Kellgren-Lawrence grades [KL] 0/1 to 3/4), 2) typical (increase in KL, excluding accelerated osteoarthritis), or 3) no KOA (no change in KL). We assessed tibiofemoral cartilage damage (four regions: medial/lateral tibia/femur), bone marrow lesion (BML) volume (four regions: medial/lateral tibia/femur), and whole knee effusion-synovitis volume on 3 T MR images with semi-automated programs. We calculated two MR-based composite scores. Cumulative damage was the sum of standardized cartilage damage. Disease activity was the sum of standardized volumes of effusion-synovitis and BMLs. We focused on annual images from 2 years before to 2 years after radiographic onset (or a matched time for those without knee osteoarthritis). To determine between group differences in the composite metrics at all time points, we used generalized linear mixed models with group (3 levels) and time (up to 5 levels). For our prognostic analysis, we used multinomial logistic regression models to determine if one-year worsening in each composite metric change associated with future accelerated knee osteoarthritis (odds ratios [OR] based on units of 1 standard deviation of change). Results Prior to disease onset, the accelerated KOA group had greater average disease activity compared to the typical and no KOA groups and this persisted up to 2 years after disease onset. During a pre-radiographic disease period, the odds of developing accelerated KOA were greater in people with worsening disease activity [versus typical KOA OR (95% confidence interval [CI]): 1.58 (1.08 to 2.33); versus no KOA: 2.39 (1.55 to 3.71)] or cumulative damage [versus typical KOA: 1.69 (1.14 to 2.51); versus no KOA: 2.11 (1.41 to 3.16)]. Conclusions MR-based disease activity and cumulative damage metrics may be prognostic markers to help identify people at risk for accelerated onset and progression of knee osteoarthritis.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Can comprehensive quantitative indicators of knee joint structure (based on magnetic resonance imaging, MRI) predict the radiological onset of accelerated knee osteoarthritis (KOA)?** Specifically, the study aims to determine whether comprehensive structural measurement indicators can predict the occurrence and development of accelerated knee osteoarthritis before the appearance of radiological manifestations during the progression of knee osteoarthritis. ### Research Background Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is generally considered a gradually progressive disease and is one of the main causes of physical disability. However, at least 20% of patients will experience a more painful, more severe, and more rapidly progressive form of knee osteoarthritis, namely accelerated knee osteoarthritis. This accelerated knee osteoarthritis is characterized by the development from a normal joint to an advanced radiological lesion within 4 years, and sometimes even progresses within 1 year. Compared with typical knee osteoarthritis, patients with accelerated knee osteoarthritis are more likely to report frequent knee pain before the appearance of radiological manifestations and show lower physical functions (such as slower walking speed and chair - standing speed). In addition, these patients are also more likely to receive drug treatment or knee replacement surgery. ### Research Objectives 1. **Compare differences between different groups**: The study first aims to determine the differences in disease activity and cumulative damage before and after the radiological onset among the accelerated knee osteoarthritis group, the typical knee osteoarthritis group, and the non - knee osteoarthritis group. 2. **Predict the development of accelerated knee osteoarthritis**: Secondly, the study aims to determine whether changes in disease activity and cumulative damage within one year before the radiological onset can predict the future occurrence of accelerated knee osteoarthritis. ### Main Findings - Starting one year before the radiological onset, the disease activity in the accelerated knee osteoarthritis group was significantly higher than that in the typical knee osteoarthritis group and the non - knee osteoarthritis group, and this difference continued until two years after the onset. - After the onset, the cumulative damage in the accelerated knee osteoarthritis group increased significantly, especially reaching the highest point two years after the onset. - Within one year before the radiological onset, the deterioration of disease activity and cumulative damage was closely related to the future occurrence of accelerated knee osteoarthritis. Specifically: - For every one - standard - deviation increase in disease activity deterioration, the probability of developing into accelerated knee osteoarthritis increased by 58% (compared with typical knee osteoarthritis) and 139% (compared with non - knee osteoarthritis), respectively. - For every one - standard - deviation increase in cumulative damage deterioration, the probability of developing into accelerated knee osteoarthritis increased by 69% (compared with typical knee osteoarthritis) and 111% (compared with non - knee osteoarthritis), respectively. ### Conclusion The study shows that comprehensive indicators of disease activity and cumulative damage based on MRI may be effective markers for predicting the occurrence of accelerated knee osteoarthritis. These indicators can help identify those at high risk of developing into accelerated knee osteoarthritis in the future, thus providing a basis for early intervention. ### Formula Representation To ensure the correctness and readability of the formulas, the following are the key formulas involved in the article: - Formula for calculating the standardized individual MRI measurement value: \[ \text{Standardized measurement value}=\frac{\text{Individual normalized measurement value}-\text{Overall group average}}{\text{Overall group standard deviation}} \] - Formulas for calculating composite indicators: - Disease Activity: \[ \text{Disease Activity}=\sum_{i = 1}^{4}(\text{Standardized BML volume}_i+\text{Standardized joint effusion - synovitis volume}) \] - Cumulative Damage: \[ \text{Cumulative Damage}=\sum_{i = 1}^{4}(\text{Standardized CDI}_i) \] Through these formulas, researchers can integrate multiple MRI measurement results into two composite indicators, thereby more comprehensively evaluating the progression of knee osteoarthritis.

Composite quantitative knee structure metrics predict the development of accelerated knee osteoarthritis: data from the osteoarthritis initiative

Early pre-radiographic structural pathology precedes the onset of accelerated knee osteoarthritis

Accelerated Knee Osteoarthritis Is Characterized by Destabilizing Meniscal Tears and Preradiographic Structural Disease Burden

Association of Knee Injuries With Accelerated Knee Osteoarthritis Progression: Data From the Osteoarthritis Initiative

Risk factors and the natural history of accelerated knee osteoarthritis: a narrative review

A Preliminary Study of Quantitative MRI Cartilage Loss Fraction and Its Association With Future Arthroplasty Using the Osteoarthritis Initiative Database

Predicting incident radiographic knee osteoarthritis through quantitative meniscal lesion parameters: data from the osteoarthritis initiative

Predicting the onset of end-stage knee osteoarthritis over two- and five-years using machine learning

Clinical significance of worsening versus stable preradiographic MRI lesions in a cohort study of persons at higher risk for knee osteoarthritis

Natural history of cartilage damage and osteoarthritis progression on magnetic resonance imaging in a population-based cohort with knee pain

Do Existing MRI Definitions of Knee Osteoarthritis Identify Knees That Will Develop Clinically Significant Disease Over Up To 11 Years of Follow-Up?

Semi-quantitative MRI biomarkers of knee osteoarthritis progression in the FNIH biomarkers consortium cohort - Methodologic aspects and definition of change

Prediction model for knee osteoarthritis incidence, including clinical, genetic and biochemical risk factors

Interactions of cumulative load with biomarkers of cartilage turnover predict knee cartilage change over 2 years: data from the osteoarthritis initiative

DeepKOA: a deep-learning model for predicting progression in knee osteoarthritis using multimodal magnetic resonance images from the osteoarthritis initiative

Predictive value of MRI features for development of radiographic osteoarthritis in a cohort of participants with pre-radiographic knee osteoarthritis—the CHECK study

Gait, physical activity and tibiofemoral cartilage damage: a longitudinal machine learning analysis in the Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study

Performance of Radiological and Biochemical Biomarkers in Predicting Radio-Symptomatic Knee Osteoarthritis Progression

MRI-based Texture Analysis of Infrapatellar Fat Pad to Predict Knee Osteoarthritis Incidence.

Do knee-straining activities influence the subchondral bone microarchitecture and accelerate knee osteoarthritis progression?

Causal Discovery in Radiographic Markers of Knee Osteoarthritis and Prediction for Knee Osteoarthritis Severity With Attention–Long Short-Term Memory