Is yearly rainfall amount a good predictor for agriculture viability in drylands? Modelling traditional cultivation practices of drought-resistant crops: an ethnographic approach for the study of long-term resilience and sustainability

Abel Ruiz-Giralt,Stefano Biagetti,Marco Madella,Carla Lancelotti

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32942/osf.io/qvtwm

2020-05-11

Abstract:FAO guidelines on water requirements for plant growth in the absence of irrigation, stipulate that cultivation is not viable in areas with less than 450mm of annual rainfall. Indeed, in all maps of agricultural land use, most hyper-arid, arid, and semi-arid drylands are considered unproductive. Yet, modern societies in arid and semi-arid drylands still practice rainfed cultivation under regimes of much lower annual rainfall. This paper presents the results of ethnographic and cross-cultural investigations in the cultivation of Pearl millet, Finger millet and Sorghum, with a global perspective. We use published ethnographic material and novel data collected on the field to build and test models that display the interaction of ecological and geographic variables in explaining agricultural practices. The aim of this research is to show how rainfed agriculture is practised much more often, and in much more suitable areas, than normally reported. This holds the potential for the understanding of how these practices can play a pivotal role for long-term resilience and future sustainability of agricultural systems in drylands.