Abstract:PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to discuss the theoretical contribution of Li’s (2016) “Yin-Yang balancing” approach of paradox management, as well as its future development to guide paradox management research across the east and west contexts.Design/methodology/approachIt begins by recognizing the importance of paradox management research, especially the indigenous epistemological approach as Li (2016) has followed. The authors take “being” and “becoming” ontology toward social reality as the basic premise in this commentary, and summarize the knowledge that the study has contributed to existing literature.FindingsThe “Yin-Yang balancing” approach can extend the knowledge about paradox management phenomena at least from four aspects: the “either/and” frame to view a paradox system, the importance of “seed” or “threshold” in defining moderate rather than extreme groups, duality map as a novel tool for paradox management, and comparison of being and becoming ontology.Originality/valueBased on the comparison of “being” and “becoming” ontological view, the authors suggest to further develop this “Yin-Yang balancing” approach by emphasizing the following issues: eastern culture does not have exclusive ownership of the “becoming” ontology toward the world, elaboration of alternative theoretical explanation to win out the identity approach about organizational existence, the linkage between the “Yin-Yang balancing” epistemological system and process research method, and boundary condition of the “Yin-Yang balancing” approach.

Solving Paradox by Reducing Expectation

The Dark Side of Organizational Paradoxes: The Dynamics of Disempowerment

Resolving Bertrand's Probability Paradox

Paradox and Thinking of Solving Paradox

Understanding pragmatic paradoxes: When contradictions become paralyzing and what to do about it

Utility with Relative Loss Reduction: A Unifying Decision Model for Resolving Four Well-Known Paradoxes. In 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'18) (pp. 687-695). AAAI Press

Expected Utility with Relative Loss Reduction: A Unifying Decision Model for Resolving Four Well-Known Paradoxes.

Paradox Research in Management Science: Looking Back to Move Forward

Paradox, dialectics or trade‐offs? A double loop model of paradox

How Does Digitalization Alter the Paradox of Supply Base Concentration? the Effects of Digitalization Intensity and Breadth

A Study of the Paradoxes in Decision-making Logic

Paradoxes in Digital Government: A Systematic Literature Review

Ambiguous by a paradoxical leader: How and when paradoxical leadership hinders employee proactive behavior

Do Bystanders Always See More Than the Players? Exploring Solomon’s Paradox Through Meta-Analysis

Being Versus Becoming Ontology of Paradox Management

Do bystanders always see more than the players? Exploring Solomon's paradox through meta-analysis

How Do Leaders Cope with the Paradoxical Situations? the Development of Paradoxical Leadership

Demystifying the winning managerial characteristics for handling organizational paradoxes

A Study on Maximization Paradox and Its Psychological Origin

Paradoxical Leader Behaviors in People Management: Antecedents and Consequences

Quantum Approach to Organizational Paradox: A Copenhagen Perspective