Supplier evolution in global value chains and the new brand game from an attention‐based view

Christian Lechner,Gianni Lorenzoni,Simone Guercini,Gaël Gueguen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/gsj.1381
IF: 7.393
2020-06-10
Global Strategy Journal
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Plain language summary</h3><p>Suppliers from emerging economies have been particularly active in acquiring brands from advanced economies. We analyze changes in the global value chain of the sports shoe industry and show how hollowing out the asset bases of brand‐holding firms through increasing outsourcing has enabled the emergence of rising power firms, as well as a new brand game and a market for brands. These developments in the GVC might be a future challenge for traditional brand‐holding lead firms. We show that managers focused on branding and distribution issues were myopic toward the strategic initiatives of suppliers. Managers need to pay attention to the potential long‐term consequences of outsourcing and offshoring activities, as suppliers could become competitors or acquirers of their order‐giving firms, leading to the question: Are we approaching a state of dual GVC leadership, or do lead firms risk being kicked out by their suppliers?</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Technical summary</h3><p>We explore the emergence of rising power firms from the peripheries of global value chains. An increasing number of major brand‐holding companies from traditionally industrialized economies have been acquired by suppliers from newly industrialized economies due to some fundamental changes. First, the emergence of a market for brands makes brands more volatile. Second, continuous outsourcing and hollowing‐out of the lead firm's asset base has reduced their ability to control the GVC. Through a longitudinal case study analysis, by adopting an attention‐based view, we investigate the behaviour of the traditional lead firms. Lead firms were not only myopic to the activities of their suppliers, but their focus on downstream activities created increasing opportunity spaces upstream for rising power firms while weakening the defense capacity of brands.</p></section>
management
What problem does this paper attempt to address?