Abstract:BACKGROUND: In an era of easy access to information, university students who will soon enter health professions need to develop their information competencies. The Research Readiness Self-Assessment (RRSA) is based on the Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education, and it measures proficiency in obtaining health information, evaluating the quality of health information, and understanding plagiarism.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure the proficiency of college-age health information consumers in finding and evaluating electronic health information; to assess their ability to discriminate between peer-reviewed scholarly resources and opinion pieces or sales pitches; and to examine the extent to which they are aware of their level of health information competency.METHODS: An interactive 56-item online assessment, the Research Readiness Self-Assessment (RRSA), was used to measure the health information competencies of university students. We invited 400 students to take part in the study, and 308 participated, giving a response rate of 77%. The RRSA included multiple-choice questions and problem-based exercises. Declarative and procedural knowledge were assessed in three domains: finding health information, evaluating health information, and understanding plagiarism. Actual performance was contrasted with self-reported skill level. Upon answering all questions, students received a results page that summarized their numerical results and displayed individually tailored feedback composed by an experienced librarian.RESULTS: Even though most students (89%) understood that a one-keyword search is likely to return too many documents, few students were able to narrow a search by using multiple search categories simultaneously or by employing Boolean operators. In addition, nearly half of the respondents had trouble discriminating between primary and secondary sources of information as well as between references to journal articles and other published documents. When presented with questionable websites on nonexistent nutritional supplements, only 50% of respondents were able to correctly identify the website with the most trustworthy features. Less than a quarter of study participants reached the correct conclusion that none of the websites made a good case for taking the nutritional supplements. Up to 45% of students were unsure if they needed to provide references for ideas expressed in paraphrased sentences or sentences whose structure they modified. Most respondents (84%) believed that their research skills were good, very good, or excellent. Students' self-perceptions of skill tended to increase with increasing level of education. Self-reported skills were weakly correlated with actual skill level, operationalized as the overall RRSA score (Cronbach alpha = .78 for 56 RRSA items).CONCLUSIONS: While the majority of students think that their research skills are good or excellent, many of them are unable to conduct advanced information searches, judge the trustworthiness of health-related websites and articles, and differentiate between various information sources. Students' self-reports may not be an accurate predictor of their actual health information competencies.

Health literacy among visiting college students in the U.S.: A pilot study

Health literacy: a cross-disciplinary study in American undergraduate college students

Are college students health literate?

eHealth Literacy and Health Behaviors Affecting Modern College Students: A Pilot Study of Issues Identified by the American College Health Association

Development of a Health Literacy Assessment for Young Adult College Students: A Pilot Study

eHealth Literacy Among College Students: A Systematic Review With Implications for eHealth Education

Evaluating mental health literacy amongst US college students: a cross sectional study

Examining Communicative, Critical Health Literacy and eHealth Literacy among International University Students Residing in Japan

Health Literacy amongst Health Professional University Students: A Study Using the Health Literacy Questionnaire

A Smart Research Framework for Local Undergraduate Colleges’ Health Literacy Survey Based on Distributed Data Collection System

Health Information Seeking Behavior Among College Students

The relationship between health literacy and health-seeking behavior amongst university students in Ghana: A cross-sectional study

eHealth Literacy of 2-Year and 4-Year College Students: Implications for Health Education in a Post-Truth Era

Health Information Literacy and Competencies of Information Age Students: Results From the Interactive Online Research Readiness Self-Assessment (RRSA)

Health Literacy, Health Information Seeking Behaviors and Internet Use Among Patients Attending a Private and Public Clinic in the Same Geographic Area

Health Literacy, Digital Health Literacy, and COVID-19 Pandemic Attitudes and Behaviors in U.S. College Students: Implications for Interventions

Examining Health Behaviors, Health Literacy, and Self-efficacy in College Students With Chronic Conditions

Mental health literacy and relational health literacy among college students.

Cross-sectional survey of health literacy among health science students in Singapore

"Was Test Designed for Africans?" Health Literacy and African Immigrants

Health Literacy Among University Students: A Systematic Review of Cross-Sectional Studies