Small RNA Sequencing across Diverse Biofluids Identifies Optimal Methods for exRNA Isolation
Srimeenakshi Srinivasan,Ashish Yeri,Pike See Cheah,Allen Chung,Kirsty Danielson,Peter De Hoff,Justyna Filant,Clara D Laurent,Lucie D Laurent,Rogan Magee,Courtney Moeller,Venkatesh L Murthy,Parham Nejad,Anu Paul,Isidore Rigoutsos,Rodosthenis Rodosthenous,Ravi V Shah,Bridget Simonson,Cuong To,David Wong,Irene K Yan,Xuan Zhang,Leonora Balaj,Xandra O Breakefield,George Daaboul,Roopali Gandhi,Jodi Lapidus,Eric Londin,Tushar Patel,Robert L Raffai,Anil K Sood,Roger P Alexander,Saumya Das,Louise C Laurent
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.024
IF: 64.5
2019-04-04
Cell
Abstract:Poor reproducibility within and across studies arising from lack of knowledge regarding the performance of extracellular RNA (exRNA) isolation methods has hindered progress in the exRNA field. A systematic comparison of 10 exRNA isolation methods across 5 biofluids revealed marked differences in the complexity and reproducibility of the resulting small RNA-seq profiles. The relative efficiency with which each method accessed different exRNA carrier subclasses was determined by estimating the proportions of extracellular vesicle (EV)-, ribonucleoprotein (RNP)-, and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-specific miRNA signatures in each profile. An interactive web-based application (miRDaR) was developed to help investigators select the optimal exRNA isolation method for their studies. miRDar provides comparative statistics for all expressed miRNAs or a selected subset of miRNAs in the desired biofluid for each exRNA isolation method and returns a ranked list of exRNA isolation methods prioritized by complexity, expression level, and reproducibility. These results will improve reproducibility and stimulate further progress in exRNA biomarker development.