Abstract:The purpose of this paper is an analysis of the presence of self-selection mechanisms on the market that could bring the market closer to the separating equilibrium state, in line with the Rothschild–Stiglitz equilibrium model and its subsequent modifications. An example is the Polish market of compulsory third-party liability insurance of vehicle owners. This paper describes this market in terms of both its structure and its financial results. The main focus is on describing the assumptions of the Rothschild–Stiglitz model for markets operating under the conditions of information asymmetry and based on the self-selection mechanism, allowing for an unequivocal determination of the insured’s profile without the need to actually observe the insured’s behaviour. Finally, we show that thanks to the self-selection induced by the possibility of driving behaviour monitoring, the industry can minimise the negative effect information asymmetry has on the motor insurance market. This can be achieved, for example, by observing the choices made by the insured after being offered a new voluntary contract with a premium based on telematics data. Our analysis was carried out with the use of three selected characteristics that can determine the insured’s risk profile, i.e., distance covered, self-assessment, and insurance premium paid; the significance of the latter—although it may be intuitive—is questionable at commonly accepted significance levels. Therefore, the main result is that although there is some evidence on the disputed matter, there can be no definitive conclusion—especially in terms of risk as measured by insurance premium.

Black boxes and market efficiency: the effect on premiums in the Italian motor-vehicle insurance market

Algorithmic Audit of Italian Car Insurance: Evidence of Unfairness in Access and Pricing

Effects of Monitoring Technology on the Insurance Market

Machine learning based car accident risk prediction for usage-based insurance

A Bayesian Approach for Prioritising Driving Behaviour Investigations in Telematic Auto Insurance Policies

Pricing weekly motor insurance drivers' with behavioral and contextual telematics data

Semi-autonomous vehicles: Usage-based data evidences of what could be expected from eliminating speed limit violations

Can Automobile Insurance Telematics Predict the Risk of Near-Miss Events?

Driving Risk Assessment Using Near-Miss Events Based on Panel Poisson Regression and Panel Negative Binomial Regression

Can Telematics Improve Driving Style? The Use of Behavioural Data in Motor Insurance

Enhancing Vehicle Safety: Smart Accident Detection Using Vehicle Black Box Technology

Good Drivers Pay Less: A Study of Usage-Based Vehicle Insurance Models

Assessing Driving Risk Using Internet of Vehicles Data: An Analysis Based on Generalized Linear Models

Big data, risk classification, and privacy in insurance markets

Risk Self-Selection and the Concept of Equilibrium in a Competitive Insurance Market

Performance assessment of ADAS in a representative subset of critical traffic situations

Insurtech, sensor data, and changes in customers' coverage choices: Evidence from usage‐based automobile insurance

Analyzing the Influence of Telematics-Based Pricing Strategies on Traditional Rating Factors in Auto Insurance Rate Regulation

Information Asymmetry, Ex Ante Moral Hazard, and Uninsurable Risk in Liability Coverage: Evidence from China's Automobile Insurance Market

Measuring data access and re-use in the European Legal Framework for Data, from the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) law to the Proposed Data Act: the case of vehicle data

Data Mining of Telematics Data: Unveiling the Hidden Patterns in Driving Behaviour