Abstract:In a world where a large percentage of children are learning how to interact expertly with electronic devices and navigate mobile operating systems before they can even speak, and have grown up with the non-existence of the idea of “disconnecting” with the constant flow of content on the screen, it is no longer possible to reject development and adapt to the requirements of the new stage as we are on the brink of the fifth industrial revolution [1] in which artificial intelligence technologies merge with the work of the human element, and robots coexist with humans. Whatever the name given to the next technological era, and whatever the number it will be labeled with, it will be the last era of inventions and discoveries that humans alone will accomplish exclusively. This prompts experts in the field to consider that “merging with artificially intelligent technology will be like learning how to live with a new gender” [2]. In recent years in particular, artificial intelligence technology has achieved remarkable successes that have proven its pioneering capabilities, and the discussion about it has not remained confined to academic circles, but has occupied the front rows in the halls of official decision-making, and competing voices have risen around it from the highest platforms [3]. The contributions of AI technologies to combating the coronavirus pandemic are still fresh in our minds. Robots have been used to reduce human contact; there are nursing robots, delivery robots, surveillance drones, sterilizing robots, and mobile robots that detect infected people on the street. Big data technologies are also being used to examine surveillance cameras on the streets to recognize faces, as happened in China, where an algorithm combines the health record, the criminal file, and the public transport travel map to identify all the people who have been in contact with the infected person, and quarantine him as a result [4]. Because this reality has begun to cast its shadow on the judicial systems with the entry of artificial intelligence systems into the justice sector, imposing its challenges on them, and even throwing its problems in their face, the judicial decision has become facing serious challenges that raise legitimate questions on the research table, the answers to which converge with the strategic direction of Oman Vision 2040 in the field of legislation, judiciary, and oversight in terms of strengthening the rule of law in society and achieving community security, and in general, it addresses the application of the foundations of governance in the organization of legislation and judiciary, and revolves around the extent of the benefit of introducing artificial intelligence systems in the stage of preparing the judicial decision and the limits of this benefit on the one hand (section one), and the extent of the possibility of using these systems in the stage of building the judicial decision itself on the other hand (section two).

Privacy and Data Protection Constraints to Automated Decision-Making in the Judiciary

Judicial Decisions and Artificial Intelligence

Automated individual decision-making and profiling [on case C-634/21 - SCHUFA (Scoring)]

Artificial intelligence, algorithmic recommendation and decision-making in European Union law: analysis of the regulatory challenge and legal certainty

AI-supported decision-making under the general data protection regulation

Automated Decision-Making in The EU Member State’s Public Administration: The Compliance of Automated Decisions of the Estonian Unemployment Insurance Fund with Estonian Administrative Procedure Law

Artificial Intelligence in the Judiciary: Issues and Outlooks

Artificial intelligence in judicial proceedings and court decisions, potential and risks

Impact of Artificial Intelligence on the Sphere of the Judiciary and the Perspectives for Future Research

The Ethics of Automating Legal Actors

Algorithms in the court: does it matter which part of the judicial decision-making is automated?

Can everyday AI be ethical. Fairness of Machine Learning Algorithms

An Introduction to Automated Decision-Making (ADM) and Cyber-Delegation in the Scope of EU Public Law

Using of Artificial Intelligence Methods in Judicial Proceedings

Editorial: European Law Restrictions on Tax Authorities’ Use of Artificial Intelligence Systems: Reflections on Some Recent Developments

Protecting Judicial Decisions in the Age of Artificial Intelligence A New Challenge to the Rule of Law

Cui bono? Judicial decision-making in the era of AI: A qualitative study on the expectations of judges in Germany

Technology and the Courts: Artificial Intelligence and Judicial Impartiality

Artificial intelligence and judicial decision-making: Evaluating the role of AI in debiasing

Can algorithmic recruitment systems lawfully utilise automated decision-making in the EU?

AI in judicial application of law and the right to a court