Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the COVID‐19 pandemic: a survey of junior doctors in the UK National Health Service

MP Rimmer,BH Al Wattar,Catriona Barlow,Naomi Black,Ciara Carpenter,Frances Conti‐Ramsden,John A W Dalton,Rhianna Davies,Rebecca Davies,Cheryl Dunlop,Elvena Guyett,Laura Jamison,Babu Karavadra,Lorraine Kasaven,Katherine Lattey,Emma Long,Caroline Macmahon,Kate Navaratnam,Simrit Nijjar,Stephen O'Brien,Obi Ojukwu,Laura Parnell,Olivia Raglan,Meera Ramcharn,Jenny Riches,Linden Jane Stocker,Siew Chee Wong,Charlotte Wyeth,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16313
2020-05-27
Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) pandemic is disrupting health services worldwide. We aimed to evaluate the provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services in the UK during the acute phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Design</h3><p>Interview‐based national survey.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Setting</h3><p>Women's healthcare units in the National Health Service.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Population</h3><p>Junior doctors in obstetrics and gynaecology.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>Participants were interviewed by members of the UK Audit and Research in Obstetrics and Gynaecology trainees' collaborative between 28 March and 7 April 2020. We used a quantitative analysis for closed‐ended questions and a thematic framework analysis for open comments.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>We received responses from 148/155 units (95%), most of the participants were in years 3–7 of training (121/148, 82%). Most completed specific training drills for managing obstetric and gynaecological emergencies in women with COVID‐19 (89/148, 60.1%) and two‐person donning and doffing of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) (96/148, 64.9%). The majority of surveyed units implemented COVID‐19‐specific protocols (130/148, 87.8%), offered adequate PPE (135/148, 91.2%) and operated dedicated COVID‐19 emergency theatres (105/148, 70.8%). Most units reduced face‐to‐face antenatal clinics (117/148, 79.1%) and suspended elective gynaecology services (131/148, 88.5%). The 2‐week referral pathway for oncological gynaecology was not affected in half of the units (76/148, 51.4%), but half reported a planned reduction in oncology surgery (82/148, 55.4%).</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>The provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services in the UK during the acute phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic seems to be in line with current guidelines, but strategic planning is needed to restore routine gynaecology services and ensure safe access to maternity care in the long term.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Tweetable abstract</h3><p>Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the acute phase of COVID‐19 is in line with current guidelines, strategic planning is needed to restore routine services and ensure safe access to care in the long term.</p></section>
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?