0415 Metabolic Dysfunction and Sleep Disruption in Models of Alzheimer’s Disease

C M Carroll,M Stanley,S L Macauley
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.412
IF: 6.313
2020-04-01
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Metabolic perturbations and sleep disruptions are a cause and consequence of Alzheimer’s disease pathophysiology. A bidirectional relationship exists where impairments in sleep and metabolism contribute to the development of Alzheimer’s disease while the presence of Alzheimer’s disease pathology leads to decreased cerebral metabolism, peripheral glucose intolerance, and disrupted sleep. While the effects of type 2 diabetes (T2D) and Alzheimer’s disease on sleep have been explored separately, no previous studies have examined the effect of acute glycemic variability, a defining feature of T2D, on sleep in the context of Alzheimer’s disease. The goal of this study is to determine how glycemic variability drives sleep disruptions by modifying the relationship between cerebral glucose metabolism and neuronal activity. Methods Biosensors are implanted bilaterally into the hippocampus of APP/PS1, a model of amyloid-beta (Aβ) overexpression, and P301S, a model of tau deposition and neurodegeneration, mice to measure ISF glucose and lactate, markers of cerebral metabolism and neuronal activity, respectively. Simultaneous cortical EEG/EMG recordings are used for sleep/wake scoring and analysis. Results Glycemic fluctuations cause a decoupling of the typical relationships between cerebral metabolism and neuronal activity, while also increasing arousal in 3-month-old, wildtype mice. The presence of AD-like pathology results in a similar, albeit muted cerebral metabolic response to peripheral glycemic variability, but a diminished effect on wakefulness, likely due to age- and pathology-dependent increases in overall time spent awake. Conversely, in aged, P301S mice, cerebral metabolic responsiveness is lost and a ceiling effect on wakefulness emerges, suggesting differential effects on sleep with tau accumulation. Moreover, aged mice show progressive disruptions to overall sleep quality and quantity, highlighting the synergism existing between AD-like pathology and glucose intolerance in sleep dysfunction. Lactate seems to be a common driver of disruption in this synergistic cycle. Conclusion This study represents a novel approach to defining the dynamic interplay between risk factors for AD and T2D and suggests a feedforward loop of disease progression where disrupted sleep can alter the relationship between neuronal activity, metabolism, and pathology. Support NIH/NIA 1K01AG050719. Harold and Mary Eagle Fund for Alzheimer’s Research New Vision Award through Donors Cure Foundation
neurosciences,clinical neurology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?