Abstract:BackgroundAlthough protective mechanical ventilation (MV) has been used in a variety of applications, lung injury may occur in both patients with and without acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The purpose of this study is to use machine learning to identify clinical phenotypes for critically ill patients with MV in intensive care units (ICUs).MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted with 5013 patients who had undergone MV and treatment in the Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Statistical and machine learning methods were used. All the data used in this study, including demographics, vital signs, circulation parameters and mechanical ventilator parameters, etc., were automatically extracted from the electronic health record (EHR) system. An external database, Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC III), was used for validation.ResultsPhenotypes were derived from a total of 4009 patients who underwent MV using a latent profile analysis of 22 variables. The associations between the phenotypes and disease severity and clinical outcomes were assessed. Another 1004 patients in the database were enrolled for validation. Of the five derived phenotypes, phenotype I was the most common subgroup (n=2174; 54.2%) and was mostly composed of the postoperative population. Phenotype II (n=480; 12.0%) led to the most severe conditions. Phenotype III (n=241; 6.01%) was associated with high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and low mean airway pressure. Phenotype IV (n=368; 9.18%) was associated with high driving pressure, and younger patients comprised a large proportion of the phenotype V group (n=746; 18.6%). In addition, we found that the mortality rate of Phenotype IV was significantly higher than that of the other phenotypes. In this subgroup, the number of patients in the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score segment (9,22] was 198, the number of deaths was 88, and the mortality rate was higher than 44%. However, the cumulative 28-day mortality of Phenotypes IV and II, which were 101 of 368 (27.4%) and 87 of 480 (18.1%) unique patients, respectively, was significantly higher than those of the other phenotypes. There were consistent phenotype distributions and differences in biomarker patterns by phenotype in the validation cohort, and external verification with MIMIC III further generated supportive results.ConclusionsFive clinical phenotypes were correlated with different disease severities and clinical outcomes, which suggested that these phenotypes may help in understanding heterogeneity in MV treatment effects.

Mechanical ventilation for acute respiratory failure due to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis versus connective tissue disease‐associated interstitial lung disease: Effectiveness and risk factors for death

Mechanical Ventilation Associated with Worse Survival in Septic Patients: a Retrospective Analysis of MIMIC-III

Mechanical Ventilation in Patients with End-Stage Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

Individualized Mechanical Power-Based Ventilation Strategy for Acute Respiratory Failure Formalized by Finite Mixture Modeling and Dynamic Treatment Regimen

Assessment of respiratory support decision and the outcome of invasive mechanical ventilation in severe COVID-19 with ARDS

Invasive Mechanical Ventilation May Be an Important Factor of Mortality in Severe/Critical COVID-19 Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Study of the juncture of invasive ventilation in treatment of severe respiratory failure of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Five Novel Clinical Phenotypes for Critically Ill Patients with Mechanical Ventilation in Intensive Care Units: a Retrospective and Multi Database Study.

The Effect of Mechanical Ventilation on Peripheral Perfusion Index and Its Association With the Prognosis of Critically Ill Patients.

Short-Term Outcomes of Patients With COVID-19 Undergoing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Observational Study From Wuhan, China

Timing of invasive mechanic ventilation in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019.

Time-varying intensity of mechanical ventilation and mortality in patients with acute respiratory failure: a registry-based, prospective cohort study

Risk Factors for the Mortality of Pneumocystis jirovecii Pneumonia in Non-HIV Patients Who Required Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Case Series Study

Risk Factors For Mortality Of Critically Ill Patients With Covid-19 Receiving Invasive Ventilation

Noninvasive Versus Invasive Mechanical Ventilation for Immunocompromised Patients with Acute Respiratory Failure: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

The impact of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease in critically ill patients: significance for survival and ventilator use

The Clinical Course of Critically Ill COVID-19 Patients Receiving Invasive Mechanical Ventilation with Subsequent Terminal Weaning

Predictors of 1-Year Mortality in Patients on Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation after Surgery in Intensive Care Unit: a Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort Study

Evaluating the Impact of Ventilator-Associated Parameters on Ventilation Free Days of non-ARDS Patients in ICU.

Significant Clinical Factors Associated with Long-term Mortality in Critical Cancer Patients Requiring Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation

Predictive value of invasive mechanical ventilation parameters for mortality in COVID-19 related ARDS: a retrospective cohort study