Abstract:Virtual reality (VR) applications are developing rapidly, becoming more and more affordable, and offer various advantages for learning contexts. Dynamic visualizations are generally suitable for depicting continuous processes (e.g., different movement patterns), and particularly dynamic virtual 3D-objects can provide different perspectives on the movements. The present study investigated through a low immersive (desktop "VR", Study 1) and a high immersive virtual environment (immersive VR; Study 2) the effectiveness of different interaction formats to view 3D-objects from different perspectives. Participants controlled either the orientation of the 3D-objects (Study 1, mouse interaction; Study 2, hand interaction via VR controllers) or their viewpoint in relation to the 3D-objects (Study 1, camera position; Study 2, position of participants' own body). Additionally, the moderating influence of learners' visuospatial ability was addressed. Dependent variables were pictorial recognition (easy, medium, difficult), factual knowledge, presence, and motion sickness. Results showed that higher-visuospatial-ability learners outperformed lower-visuospatial-ability learners. In Study 1, higher-visuospatial-ability learners showed higher recognition performance (difficult items) by controlling the camera position, whereas lower-visuospatial-ability learners suffered from this interaction format. In Study 2, higher-visuospatial-ability learners achieved better recognition performance (easy items) by controlling the 3D-models, whereas lower-visuospatial-ability learners tended to profit from moving around the 3D-objects (medium items). The immersive VR yielded more presence and higher motion sickness. This study clearly shows that different interaction formats to view 3D-objects from multiple perspectives in Desktop-VR are not transferable on a one-to-one basis into immersive VR. The results and implications for the design of virtual learning environments are discussed.

A Change of Perspective: How User Orientation Influences the Perception of Physicalizations

The Virtual Hand Illusion is Moderated by Context-Induced Spatial Reference Frames.

What We Talk About When We Talk About Data Physicality

Touching the Ground: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Data Physicalizations for Spatial Data Analysis Tasks

Levels of orientation bias differ across digital content categories: Implications for visual perception

Effects of User Interface Orientation on Sense of Immersion in Augmented Reality

Characterizing first and third person viewpoints and their alternation for embodied interaction in virtual reality

Investigating the Use of a Dynamic Physical Bar Chart for Data Exploration and Presentation

Making Data Tangible: A Cross-disciplinary Design Space for Data Physicalization

Which Body Would You Like to Have? The Impact of Embodied Perspective on Body Perception and Body Evaluation in Immersive Virtual Reality

Impact of Information Placement and User Representations in VR on Performance and Embodiment

Investigating the Effect of Operation Mode and Manifestation on Physicalizations of Dynamic Processes

How Learners' Visuospatial Ability and Different Ways of Changing the Perspective Influence Learning About Movements in Desktop and Immersive Virtual Reality Environments

Altercentrism in perspective-taking: The role of humanisation in embodying the agent's point of view

Mean orientation discrimination based on proximal stimuli

From Avatars to Agents: Self-Related Cues Through Embodiment and Personalization Affect Body Perception in Virtual Reality

The relevance to social interaction modulates bistable biological-motion perception

A Comparative Study of Table Sized Physicalization and Digital Visualization

Manipulating avatar age and gender in level-2 visual perspective taking

Subjective Evaluation of Forms in an Immersive Environment