Abstract:Abstract Background The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the vast differences in approaches to the control and containment of coronavirus across the world and has demonstrated the varied success of such approaches in minimizing the transmission of coronavirus. While previous studies have demonstrated high predictive power of incorporating air travel data and governmental policy responses in global disease transmission modelling, factors influencing the decision to implement travel and border restriction policies have attracted relatively less attention. This paper examines the role of globalization on the pace of adoption of international travel-related non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) during the coronavirus pandemic. This study aims to offer advice on how to improve the global planning, preparation, and coordination of actions and policy responses during future infectious disease outbreaks with empirical evidence. Methods and data We analyzed data on international travel restrictions in response to COVID-19 of 185 countries from January to October 2020. We applied time-to-event analysis to examine the relationship between globalization and the timing of travel restrictions implementation. Results The results of our survival analysis suggest that, in general, more globalized countries, accounting for the country-specific timing of the virus outbreak and other factors, are more likely to adopt international travel restrictions policies. However, countries with high government effectiveness and globalization were more cautious in implementing travel restrictions, particularly if through formal political and trade policy integration. This finding is supported by a placebo analysis of domestic NPIs, where such a relationship is absent. Additionally, we find that globalized countries with high state capacity are more likely to have higher numbers of confirmed cases by the time a first restriction policy measure was taken. Conclusions The findings highlight the dynamic relationship between globalization and protectionism when governments respond to significant global events such as a public health crisis. We suggest that the observed caution of policy implementation by countries with high government efficiency and globalization is a by-product of commitment to existing trade agreements, a greater desire to ‘learn from others’ and also perhaps of ‘confidence’ in a government’s ability to deal with a pandemic through its health system and state capacity. Our results suggest further research is warranted to explore whether global infectious disease forecasting could be improved by including the globalization index and in particular, the de jure economic and political, and de facto social dimensions of globalization, while accounting for the mediating role of government effectiveness. By acting as proxies for a countries’ likelihood and speed of implementation for international travel restriction policies, such measures may predict the likely time delays in disease emergence and transmission across national borders.

The International Health Regulations, COVID-19, and bordering practices: Who gets in, what gets out, and who gets rescued?

The International Health Regulations (2005), the threat of populism and the COVID-19 pandemic

Why the COVID-19 response needs International Relations

WHO International Health Regulations (IHR) vs COVID-19 Uncertainty

A Contemporary View of Disrespecting the International Health Regulations During the COVID-19 Pandemic and Why

Sustainable Border Control Policy in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Math Modeling Study

Has Global Health Law Risen to Meet the COVID-19 Challenge? Revisiting the International Health Regulations to Prepare for Future Threats

The potential effectiveness of the WHO International Health Regulations capacity requirements on control of the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study of 114 countries

20.A. Round table: COVID-19, infectious diseases, and human rights and risks in public health

Learning about COVID-19 across borders: public health information and adherence among international travellers to the UK

Pandemic bordering: domestic politicisation, European coordination, and national border closures in the COVID-19 crisis

Travel restrictions and infectious disease outbreaks

How does globalization affect COVID-19 responses?

Should international borders re-open? The impact of travel restrictions on COVID-19 importation risk

A global analysis of quarantine and isolation policies governing outbreak responses

Following Data As It Crosses Borders During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Increasing compliance with international pandemic law: international relations and new global health agreements

Unhealthy geopolitics: can the response to COVID-19 reform climate change policy?

The Pandemic Paradox in International Law

International HRM insights for navigating the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications for future research and practice

Borders and Mobility Injustice in the Context of the Covid-19 Pandemic