Abstract:The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has brought renewed urgency to the question of what constitutes an aerosol-generating procedure. Public health agencies have long noted that certain medical procedures increase transmission risk for respiratory pathogens because they generate aerosols. In contrast with respiratory droplets, aerosols are minute respiratory particles that are small enough and light enough to remain suspended in the air for long periods of time, travel beyond 6 ft from the source patient, and penetrate or circumnavigate surgical masks. Therefore, health care workers are cautioned to wear N95 respirators during aerosol-generating procedures in patients with possible SARS-CoV-2 infection, and if possible, to use airborne infection isolation rooms with 12 or more air changes per hour and negative air flow to minimize the amount of infectious aerosols in the room and to prevent their spread beyond the room.However, in practice, there is no consensus on which procedures are aerosol generating. The World Health Organization stipulates that intubation, noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, tracheotomy, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, bronchoscopy, and sputum induction are definite aerosol-generating procedures because epidemiologic studies have associated these procedures with greater risk for health care worker infections.<a class="ref-link section-jump-link" href="#svp200038r1">1</a> By contrast, high-flow oxygen and nebulization are only designated as possible aerosol-generating procedures because associations between these procedures and health care worker infections have been equivocal.With the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, professional societies have unilaterally declared a plethora of additional procedures as aerosol generating, including nasogastric tube placement, thoracentesis, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, colonoscopy, cardiac catheterization, exercise tolerance tests, pulmonary function tests, percutaneous gastric tube placement, facial surgery, second stage of labor, and others. To our knowledge, most of these designations were made on theoretical grounds rather than formal quantifications of aerosol generation or epidemiologic studies demonstrating increased risk for infection. None of these procedures appear on the official lists of aerosol-generating procedures published by the World Health Organization or the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.<a class="ref-link section-jump-link" href="#svp200038r2">2</a>,<a class="ref-link section-jump-link" href="#svp200038r3">3</a>To add to the confusion, a recent study documented that controlled intubations and extubations in asymptomatic patients generate a negligible amount of aerosols and indeed a tiny fraction of the amount generated by volitional coughing.<a class="ref-link section-jump-link" href="#svp200038r4">4</a> The same has been documented of bronchoscopy and noninvasive ventilation.<a class="ref-link section-jump-link" href="#svp200038r5">5</a> How then do we explain the studies associating these procedures with increased risk for health care worker infections?The answer lies in the evolving science of respiratory transmission. It has become clear that the traditional dichotomy between droplet vs aerosol-based transmission is overly simplistic. In practice, people routinely produce a profusion of respiratory particles in a range of sizes that include both droplets and aerosols as well as particles in between.<a class="ref-link section-jump-link" href="#svp200038r6">6</a> Respiratory particles of all sizes can carry virus and all are potentially capable of transmitting infection. The amount of respiratory particles one emits varies by activity. Quiet breathing generates a small but steady flow of aerosols. Loud speaking, heavy breathing, and coughing produce far more. Larger respiratory particles will rapidly fall to the ground within a narrow radius of the source patient. Smaller respiratory particles can remain suspended in the air but will diffuse and get diluted by the surrounding air leading to progressively lower concentrations of virus the further one is from the source patient.This translates into 4 factors that explain transmission risk during medical procedures. The first is forced air. Any time air is forced over moist respiratory mucosa, it will generate more virus-laden respiratory particles. This may explain the increased risk of infection associated with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation. However, by the same logic, coughing, spirometry, and heavy breathing should also be considered aerosol generating because these activities also increase the velocity and volume of air being forced over respiratory mucosa.The second factor is symptoms and disease severity. Symptomatic patients are more likely to have active in -Abstract Truncated-

Aerosol generating procedures, dysphagia assessment and COVID‐19: A rapid review

Knowledge translation tools to guide care of non-intubated patients with acute respiratory illness during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Anaesthesia Practice in the First Wave of the COVID-19 Outbreak in the United States: a Population-Based Cohort Study.

Guidance for otolaryngology health care workers performing aerosol generating medical procedures during the COVID-19 pandemic

A quantitative evaluation of aerosol generation during tracheal intubation and extubation

Impact of COVID-19-adapted guidelines using different airway management strategies on resuscitation quality in out-of-hospital-cardiac-arrest - a randomised manikin study

What Is an Aerosol-Generating Procedure?

Aerosol-generating otolaryngology procedures and the need for enhanced PPE during the COVID-19 pandemic: a literature review

Aerosolisation during tracheal intubation and extubation in an operating theatre setting

Evaluating dental aerosol and splatter in an open plan clinic environment: implications for the COVID-19 pandemic

Ventilation Techniques and Risk for Transmission of Coronavirus Disease, Including COVID-19

Aligning difficult airway guidelines with the anesthetic COVID-19 guidelines to develop a COVID-19 difficult airway strategy: a narrative review

An overview of COVID-19 aerosol box for preventing droplet and aerosol contaminations in healthcare providers performing airway intubation

High-Flow, Noninvasive Ventilation and Awake (Nonintubation) Proning in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 With Respiratory Failure

Aerosol generation during percutaneous tracheostomy insertion

All India difficult airway association (AIDAA) consensus guidelines for airway management in the operating room during the COVID-19 pandemic

Critical Care Guidance for Tracheostomy Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Global, Multidisciplinary Approach

Quantifying Viral Particle Aerosolization Risk During Tracheostomy Surgery and Tracheostomy Care

Recommendation of a practical guideline for safe tracheostomy during the COVID-19 pandemic

Aerosol generating procedural risks and concomitant mitigation strategies in orthodontics amid COVID-19 pandemic - An updated evidence-based review

Aerosol-generating procedures and associated control/mitigation measures: Position paper from the Canadian Dental Hygienists Association and the American Dental Hygienists' Association