Abstract:This report focuses on reviewing the types of carbon intensity metrics, and the use of such metrics across the oil and gas sector, to monitor progress towards transitioning away from fossil fuel production. Producers are under pressure to respond to challenging conditions resulting from increasing climate policy, tightening markets and a move away by investors. A number of commentators are suggesting that production may have peaked, given these emerging trends, and the post Covid-19 pandemic. From a combination of review and modeling, this report provides some key insights on carbon intensity metrics and the impact of different carbon intensities on future production, which are pertinent to the future strategies of the oil and gas sector – Narrow-scoped metrics that only include upstream emissions are insufficient for producers reporting on progress towards climate goals. The carbon intensity of the final product also needs to be considered, given that it is increasingly subject to increased demand-side policy e.g. in relation to carbon pricing, bans on the sale of internal combustion engines (ICEs) etc. Given that climate targets are expressed in absolute terms, the relative measure of progress provided by carbon intensity metrics is insufficient to guide progress towards net-zero emissions. As shown by the modelling, there is a significant decline in the levels of production permitted under climate targets by 2050. Given the need for diversification, metrics that account for scope 3 emissions will be important, to help monitor the transformation away from oil and gas. As discussed in this report, a number of IOCs appear to be making small steps in this direction, although their key business focus very much remains on oil & gas. As the IEA (2020a) has reported, less than 1% of capital expenditure is being spent outside of core business areas. However, cleaner operations are also important. Therefore, scope 1&2 metrics are still useful for minimising upstream emissions. The modelling highlights the impact for example of high carbon intensity gas resources (due to methane emissions) on their production levels. Unconventional resources, which tend to require more energy input per unit of extraction, and are more costly, appear unlikely to be exploited in our Paris-aligned case. Any assertion that higher carbon intensity production upstream can be offset by lower emissions downstream (e.g. via higher vehicle efficiency standards) is not supported by the modelling. This is particularly the case where these oil products areexported abroad to regions with low efficiency forms of transportation/limited environmental regulation. National oil companies (NOCs) have more potential to achieve emission reduction from operational emissions, although the incentives to do so might be lower (with far less scrutiny and reporting). Diversification is also likely to be more of a challenge for NOCs, due to the reliance of public budgets on revenues gained. However, a number of high-producing countries are vigorously exploring diversification strategies. Such strategies could include massively increasing support for renewable industries, and focusing on areas such as hydrogen production and CCS applications. For the large NOC producers, with the lowest-cost conventional reserves, it is likely that they may be able to continue producing for the longest time, as climate policy stringency increases. However, given that NOCs hold the largest reserves, risks of stranding will be greater in absolute terms.

Carbon intensity of global crude oil refining and mitigation potential

Global Oil Refining's Contribution to Greenhouse Gas Emissions from 2000 to 2021

Combustion Emissions from Refining Lower Quality Oil: What Is the Global Warming Potential?

Adaptive CO2 Emissions Mitigation Strategies of Global Oil Refineries in All Age Groups

Tapping into the potential CO 2 emission reduction of a crude oil transportation system from carbon footprint perspective

Influencing Factors of Carbon Emission from Typical Refining Units: Identification, Analysis, and Mitigation Potential

Fuel specification, energy consumption and CO2 emission in oil refineries

Carbon implications of marginal oils from market-derived demand shocks

Uncovering the lifecycle carbon emissions and its reduction pathways: A case study of petroleum refining enterprise

Optimal design of sustainable hydrogen networks

Assessment of the impacts of process-level energy efficiency improvement on greenhouse gas mitigation potential in the petroleum refining sector

On the Integration of CO2 Capture Technologies for an Oil Refinery

An Assessment of the Energy-Saving Potential in China's Petroleum Refining Industry from a Technical Perspective

Carbon Intensity During Oil and Gas Production Process

Carbon footprint calculation in one of the largest Gas Refinery Companies in the Middle East

Carbon-efficient production planning for long-chain integrated refinery-petrochemical processes: A material-energy-carbon optimization perspective

The refinery of the future

Emission Factors and Source Profiles of Volatile Organic Compounds in the Petroleum Refining Industry Through On-Site Measurement from Multiple Refineries

Cost and potential for CO2 emissions reduction in China’s petroleum refining sector—A bottom up analysis

A complex network perspective on embodiment of air pollutants from global oil refining industry

Impact and Challenges of Reducing Petroleum Consumption for Decarbonization