How Useful Are Tumor Markers in Detecting Metastases with FDG-PET/CT during Breast Cancer Surveillance?

Giovanni Corso,Laura Gilardi,Antonia Girardi,Alessandra Margherita De Scalzi,Gianmatteo Pagani,Elisabetta Maria Cristina Rossi,Giacomo Montagna,Paolo Veronesi,Eleonora Pagan,Vincenzo Bagnardi,Chiara Maria Grana
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000507707
2020-01-01
Oncology
Abstract:<span><b><i>Background:</i></b> To assess the clinical usefulness of serum tumor markers for early detection of distant breast cancer recurrence using FDG-PET/CT. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We retrospectively analyzed 561 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for invasive primary breast cancer and had increased tumor markers (CA 15-3 and CEA) after completion of locoregional therapy. FDG-PET/CT data were reviewed for all cases. CA 15-3 and CEA were evaluated both in a continuous and in a quartile (Q) distribution. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between increased tumor marker values and the presence (and type) of distant metastases. <b><i>Results:</i></b> The median value of CA 15-3 was 35.0 U/mL (IQR, 29.5–43.0) in cases where no distant metastases were detected, and it was 58.9 U/mL (IQR, 40.0–108.0) in cases where metastases were detected (<i>p</i> #x3c; 0.001). The median value of CEA was 6.6 U/mL (IQR, 4.4–10.0) in cases of no metastases and 12.4 U/mL (IQR, 6.9–30.0) in cases of metastases (<i>p</i> #x3c; 0.001). Increased levels of both tumor markers (Q3 and Q4) were strongly associated with the presence of distant metastases. The association between CA 15-3 and bone/liver metastases was stronger compared with other types of metastases (<i>p</i> heterogeneity between odds ratios [ORs] = 0.03 for Q3 and #x3c;0.001 for Q4), while no relevant heterogeneity between ORs emerged for CEA. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Increased tumor marker levels detected in asymptomatic breast cancer patients during adjuvant therapies and follow-up are significantly predictive of distant metastases identified on FDG-PET/CT. <br/>Oncology</span>
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?