Reducing cost and time to diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea using ambulatory sleep study: a Singapore sleep centre experience

Chu Qin Phua,Isabelle JH Jang,Kelvin Bryan Tan,Ying Hao,Siti Raudha Bte Senin,Pei Rong Song,Rui Ya Soh,Song Tar Toh
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-020-02115-z
2020-06-10
Sleep And Breathing
Abstract:The current gold standard for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is overnight in laboratory polysomnography (PSG). However, PSGs are expensive, labor-intensive, and have long wait times. An ambulatory sleep study device, the WatchPAT, has been shown to have high correlation for sleep indices measured compared with PSG (AASM, 2016). Use of the WatchPAT could potentially lead to shorter waiting times and earlier diagnosis of OSA (Lancet Resp Med 3:310–8, 2015). Our study aimed to investigate if WatchPAT reduces time to diagnosis and treatment of OSA in a tertiary healthcare setting. A secondary aim was to investigate the cost-benefit of an ambulatory sleep study.
clinical neurology,respiratory system
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to solve the problems of high cost and long time - consuming in the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Currently, the gold standard for OSA diagnosis is an all - night polysomnography (PSG) in the laboratory, but PSG is expensive, labor - intensive and has a long waiting time. To solve these problems, researchers introduced a portable sleep monitoring device - WatchPAT, to evaluate whether it can shorten the diagnosis and treatment time of OSA and analyze its cost - effectiveness advantages. ### Research Objectives 1. **Primary Objective**: To explore whether the use of WatchPAT can reduce the diagnosis time and treatment time of OSA in tertiary hospitals. 2. **Secondary Objectives**: To compare the cost - effectiveness between portable sleep monitoring (such as WatchPAT) and traditional laboratory PSG, and to investigate the reasons for WatchPAT "failure", that is, the situation of patients who need to be converted to laboratory PSG or repeat WatchPAT tests. ### Methods - **Research Design**: Retrospective analysis of the clinical database of all patients who underwent sleep monitoring in a tertiary hospital between 2014 and 2017. - **Patient Selection**: - **Inclusion Criteria**: All patients who underwent diagnostic sleep monitoring for suspected OSA, including PSG and WatchPAT. - **Exclusion Criteria**: Exclude PSG for non - diagnostic purposes (such as split - night PSG, CPAP and BiPAP titration), diagnostic PSG for non - sleep - related breathing disorders, and sleep monitoring for postoperative follow - up. - **Data Collection**: Collect baseline characteristics (age, gender, AHI, etc.), and record the order date, completion date of sleep monitoring and the CPAP prescription date. - **Data Analysis**: Use Kaplan - Meier analysis to compare the diagnosis time and treatment time of the PSG and WatchPAT groups, use the propensity score matching method to eliminate differences in baseline characteristics, and use paired T - test / Wilcoxon signed - rank test to compare the costs of the two groups. ### Results - **Baseline Characteristics**: A total of 1,898 patients underwent diagnostic sleep monitoring, of which 1,660 (88%) underwent PSG and 238 (12%) underwent WatchPAT. - **Diagnosis Time**: The average diagnosis time in the WatchPAT group was 21 days, which was significantly shorter than 79.8 days in the PSG group (p < 0.001). - **Treatment Time**: The average time from sleep monitoring order to CPAP prescription in the WatchPAT group was 46.3 days, which was significantly shorter than 118.4 days in the PSG group (p < 0.001). - **Cost - effectiveness Analysis**: The diagnosis cost of WatchPAT was $656, which was significantly lower than $1,835.5 of PSG, saving $1,179.50 per patient. ### Conclusions Portable sleep monitoring (such as WatchPAT) is a viable option, which can shorten the diagnosis and treatment time of OSA and bring significant cost savings. Therefore, for patients suitable for portable sleep monitoring, third - party payers should consider paying for it instead of traditional laboratory PSG.