Abstract:There is mounting evidence that a new set of principles is required to form and express, rather than capture, social values for sustainability. This is because many policy questions are sufficiently complex that individual people do not—possible cannot—hold fully pre-formed values with respect to them. Thus, when people are faced with such issues, a process is required to enable them collectively to form and express a bespoke set of values that are shared. This process of shared social value formation can be understood as normative, to the extent that those involved participate in a process of ascribing values to others. This invites us to reconsider the role of normative economics, because it implies that both procedural and distributive justice is unlikely to be achieved through conventional economic logic and processes. The paper argues that the theoretical traditions that have juxtaposed positive and normative economics have been lost, such that rational choice has been progressively limited to the maximisation of economic surplus. This may be acceptable for some policy areas where the state and the individual dominate. However, the formation of social values for sustainability demands a composite approach that enables individuals to work together to form values with respect to issues about which they may have little immediate reference. The paper identifies five principles for establishing normative shared social values, relating to social units of analysis, procedural and distributive justice, dialectical decision-making and the development of social value transfer as a means of relating the shared social values formed and expressed in one context with those appropriate for a related context. The paper concludes with an agenda for research that can test, develop and refine the five principles for normative deliberated social values for sustainability.

Business and Society Research Drawing on Institutionalism: Integrating Normative and Descriptive Research on Values

How Can Invisible Values Shape the Visible Organizations? A Commentary on the New Institutionalism in the Organizational Sociology

Institutional theory for corporate law: an invitation

Challenges for Institutional Theory

Data Science for Institutional and Organizational Economics

Institutional theory for corporate law

The Declining Relevance and Legitimacy of IB Scholarship in a World That Really Needs It

The Diversity and Rapprochement of Theories of Institutional Change: Original Institutionalism and New Institutional Economics

Business Ethics: The State of the Art

Institutional Legitimacy: An Exegesis Of Normative Incentives

A new normative economics for the formation of shared social values

Building on Its Past: The Future of Business and Society Scholarship

An Unexpected Means Of Embedding Ethics In Organizations: Preliminary Findings From Values-Based Evaluations

Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? an institutional theory of corporate social responsibility

The three institutionalisms and institutional dynamics: understanding endogenous and exogenous change

“Norming” and “Conforming”: Integrating Cultural and Institutional Explanations for Sustainability Adoption in Business

BUSINESS: DIFFERENCES, SIMILARITIES AND CONFLICTS1

Entrepreneurship Through a Unified Sociological Neoinstitutional Lens

Institutionalization and Structuration: Studying the Links between Action and Institution

On the Role of Institutional Logics in Legitimacy Evaluations: The Effects of Pricing and CSR Signals on Organizational Legitimacy

The Institutionalist Theory of the Business Enterprise: Past, Present, and Future