Abstract:Objective: To determine the association between sonographically measured abdominal wall thickness (AWT) and birth weight of fetuses of pregnant women with diabetes. Methods: This retrospective study included 185 pregnant women who presented to a level I perinatal centre between January 2021 and December 2022. All mothers had diabetes, and were divided into the following subgroups: diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus; insulin-dependent gestational diabetes mellitus; type 1 diabetes mellitus; and type 2 diabetes mellitus. At the time of admission, gestational age varied between 29 + 2 and 41 + 2 weeks (+days) of gestation. Weight estimation was performed routinely using the Hadlock I formula. Fetal AWT was determined retrospectively at the same axial level as used for the measurement of abdominal circumference. Only women with a sonographic fetal weight estimation within 5 days before delivery were included. Results: For the whole cohort, a moderate positive correlation was found between fetal AWT and estimated fetal weight (r = 0.411, p < 0.001), a moderate correlation was found between fetal AWT and birth weight (r = 0.493, p < 0.001), a weak correlation was found between fetal AWT and body length (r = 0.365, p < 0.001), and a weak correlation was found between fetal AWT and body length percentile (r = 0.276, p < 0.001). No strong differences in parameters were found between the diabetes subgroups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to identify newborns with birth weight > 4000 g (macrosomia) and birth weight > 90th percentile according to Voigt in the group with gestational age > 37 weeks. ROC curve analysis was performed to identify newborns with birth weight > 90th percentile in the whole cohort. AWT and sonographically estimated fetal weight were included in the calculation. The combination of AWT and estimated fetal weight only led to a marginal improvement compared with estimated fetal weight alone for predicting newborns with birth weight > 4000 g in the group with gestational age > 37 weeks [area under the curve (AUC) 0.857 vs 0.871], and for predicting newborns with birth weight > 90th percentile in the group with gestational age > 37 weeks (AUC 0.840 vs 0.846) and in the whole cohort (AUC 0.816 vs 0.826). Conclusion: A sonographically measured AWT of 7.1 mm in fetuses of diabetic mothers is predictive of birth weight > 90th percentile with sensitivity of 61 %, specificity of 85 %, and AUC of 0.748. ROC curve analysis showed that estimated fetal weight determined by ultrasound (using Hadlock formula I) seems to be slightly superior for the identification of macrosomic fetuses with birth weight > 90th percentile. A threshold value for estimated fetal weight of 3774 g had sensitivity of 70 %, specificity of 86 %, and AUC of 0.816. The combination of AWT and estimated fetal weight in a single formula only yielded a marginal improvement in accuracy compared with the use of estimated fetal weight alone.

Performance of local reference curve on the diagnosis of large for gestational age fetuses in diabetic pregnant women

Clinical value of S/D ratio of umbilical arteries and Z-scores of multiple ultrasound parameters in evaluating fetal growth restriction in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus

The Influence of HbA1c and Gestational Weight Gain on Pregnancy Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Prediction of large‐for‐gestational‐age at birth using fetal biometry in type 1 and type 2 diabetes: A retrospective cohort study

A Predictive Model for Large-for-Gestational-Age Infants among Korean Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Using Maternal Characteristics and Fetal Biometric Parameters

Clinical significance of ultrasonic umbilical artery flow analysis in pregnancy with gestational diabetes mellitus

Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Large-for-Gestational Age Infants in Mothers with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Application of 4 birthweight curves and local reference range at a University Hospital of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study

Association between glycated haemoglobin, glycated albumin and fructosamine with neonatal birthweight and large-for-date status infants in gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study

Developing and validating a predictive model of delivering large-for-gestational-age infants among women with gestational diabetes mellitus

Effect of Maternal Lipid Profile, C-peptide, Insulin, and HBA1c Levels During Late Pregnancy on Large-for-gestational Age Newborns

Population Standards of Birth Weight Underestimate Fetal Growth Abnormalities in Diabetic Pregnancies

Correlation of sonographically measured fetal abdominal wall thickness with birth weight in diabetes

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Predictive Value of Fetal Growth Measurements by Ultrasonography at 22–24 Weeks: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Medical Records

Association between extrapolated time in range and large for gestational age infants in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes

Large for Gestational Age and Adverse Outcomes: Stratified By Diabetes Status

Birthweight features of the infants of mothers diagnosed with diabetes at different gestational ages in South China from 2014 to 2018: a retrospective study

Predictive capacity of fetal pancreatic circumference for gestational diabetes mellitus

Comparison of the INTERGROWTH-21st, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, and WHO fetal growth standards

Analysis of self‐monitoring of blood glucose metrics in gestational diabetes mellitus and their association with infants born large for gestational age: A historical observational cohort study of 879 pregnancies