Abstract:Abstract The concept of translanguaging is clarified, establishing it as a particular conception of the mental grammars and linguistic practices of bilinguals. Translanguaging is different from code switching . Under translanguaging, the mental grammars of bilinguals are structured but unitary collections of features, and the practices of bilinguals are acts of feature selection, not of grammar switch. A proper understanding of translanguaging requires a return to the well known but often forgotten idea that named languages are social, not linguistic, objects. Whereas the idiolect of a particular individual is a linguistic object defined in terms of lexical and structural features, the named language of a nation or social group is not; its boundaries and membership cannot be established on the basis of lexical and structural features. The two named languages of the bilingual exist only in the outsider’s view. From the insider’s perspective of the speaker, there is only his or her full idiolect or repertoire, which belongs only to the speaker, not to any named language. Translanguaging is the deployment of a speaker’s full linguistic repertoire without regard for watchful adherence to the socially and politically defined boundaries of named (and usually national and state) languages . In schools, the translanguaging of bilinguals tends to be severely restricted. In addition, schools confuse the assessment of general linguistic proficiency, which is best manifested in bilinguals while translanguaging, with the testing of proficiency in a named language, which insists on inhibiting translanguaging. The concept of translanguaging is of special relevance to schools interested in the linguistic and intellectual growth of bilingual students as well as to minoritized communities involved in language maintenance and revitalization efforts.

Exploring New York City elementary school principals’ language ideologies

Language policy in multilingual contexts: Revisiting Ruiz’s “language-as-resource” orientation

Linguistic Landscape in Educational Spaces

Functions of language use and raciolinguistic ideologies in students’ interactions

‘Say it like the Queen’: the standard language ideology and language policy making in English primary schools

Contesting Language Ideologies in the Linguistic Schoolscapes in an Indonesian Multilingual School: A Case Study

Linguistic ideologies in multilingual South African suburban schools

Individual agency in language-in-education policy: a story of Chinese heritage language schools in multilingual Brussels

Commodification of the Chinese language: investigating language ideology in the Chinese complementary schools’ online discourse

The role of language ideologies in the self-efficacy of preservice bilingual education teachers

‘Qué barbaridad, son latinos y deberían saber español primero’: Language Ideology, Agency, and Heritage Language Insecurity across Immigrant Generations

Complicating methods for understanding educators’ language ideologies: transformative approaches for mixing methods

Scale-making, power and agency in arbitrating school-level language planning decisions

Language ideologies of Arizona preschool teachers implementing dual language teaching for the first time: pro-multilingual beliefs, practical concerns

Understanding Chinese language teachers’ language ideologies in teaching South Asian students in Hong Kong

Threading systemic change for language equity in schools

Agency in meso-level language policy planning in the face of macro-level policy shifts: a case study of multilingual education in a Chinese tertiary institution

The EMI content lecturer as a street-level bureaucrat: discretionary actions and coping mechanisms in micro-level language policy-as-produced

Clarifying translanguaging and deconstructing named languages: A perspective from linguistics

Continuity and change: language ideologies of Catalan university students

Two Worlds in One City: a Sociopolitical Perspective on Chinese Urban Families' Language Planning