Aerosol prevention box for regional anaesthesia for eye surgery in COVID times

V. V. Jaichandran,Rajiv Raman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-020-1027-5

IF: 4.4563

2020-06-16

Eye

Abstract:<p>Eye, Published online: 16 June 2020; <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41433-020-1027-5">doi:10.1038/s41433-020-1027-5</a></p>Aerosol prevention box for regional anaesthesia for eye surgery in COVID times

ophthalmology

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Aerosol box for protection during airway manipulation in covid-19 patients

Nitu Puthenveettil,Sundeep Vijayaraghavan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.IJA_375_20

2020-05-23

Indian Journal of Anaesthesia

Abstract:Sundeep Vijayaraghavan, Nitu Puthenveettil Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 2020 64(14):148-149
Patient generated aerosol in the context of ophthalmic surgery

Rodrigo Anguita,Nicholas Brennan,Conor M Ramsden,Manjit Mehat,David Keegan,Ronan Cahill,Kevin Nolan,Louise O'Toole,Louisa Wickham

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721211037823

Abstract:Objective: To assess the patterns of patient generated aerosol in the context of ophthalmic surgery and ophthalmic examinations. To inform medical teams regarding potential hazards and suggest mitigating measures. Methods: Qualitatively, real-time time videography assessed exhalation patterns from simulated patients under different clinical scenarios using propylene glycol from an e-cigarette. Quantitatively, high-speed Schlieren imaging was performed to enable high resolution recordings analysable by MATLAB technical computing software. Results: Without a face mask, the standard prior to COVID 19, vapour was observed exiting through the opening in the drape over the surgical field. The amount of vapour increased when a surgical mask was worn. With a taped face mask, the amount of vapour decreased and with inclusion of a continuous suction device, the least amount of vapour was seen. These results were equivocal when the patient was supine or sitting upright. High-speed Schlieren imaging corroborated these findings and in addition showed substantial increase in airflow egress during coughing and with ill-fitting face masks. Conclusion: Advising patients to wear a surgical mask at the time of ophthalmic interventions potentially contaminants the ocular field with patient generated aerosol risking endophthalmitis. Surgeon safety can be maintained with personal protective equipment to mitigate the increased egress of vapour from the surgical drape and taping, with or without suction is advisable, whilst meticulous hygiene around lenses is required at the time of slit lamp examination.
Anaesthesia Practice in the First Wave of the COVID-19 Outbreak in the United States: a Population-Based Cohort Study.

Vassilis Athanassoglou,Haoyan Zhong,Jashvant Poeran,Jiabin Liu,Crispiana Cozowicz,Alex Illescas,Stavros G. Memtsoudis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2022.04.003

IF: 11.719

2022-01-01

British Journal of Anaesthesia

Abstract:Editor—The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly impacted daily clinical practice. Numerous clinical practice recommendations were published during the first wave focusing on guidance to maximise patient and healthcare worker safety.1–3 However, many of these recommendations were not backed by rigorous evidence,4–7 sometimes leading to confusion. For example some experts suggested that use of tracheal intubation was preferable to supraglottic airway devices to create a closed system and minimise aerosolisation and environmental contamination, whereas others cautioned that airway instrumentation itself was aerosol generating.
Practical considerations for performing regional anesthesia: lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic

Sui An Lie,Sook Wai Wong,Loong Tat Wong,Theodore Gar Ling Wong,Shin Yuet Chong

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-020-01637-0

2020-03-24

Abstract:Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) was declared a pandemic by the World Health Organization on 11 March 2020 because of its rapid worldwide spread. In the operating room, as part of hospital outbreak response measures, anesthesiologists are required to have heightened precautions and tailor anesthetic practices to individual patients. In particular, by minimizing the many aerosol-generating procedures performed during general anesthesia, anesthesiologists can reduce exposure to patients' respiratory secretions and the risk of perioperative viral transmission to healthcare workers and other patients. To avoid any airway manipulation, regional anesthesia should be considered whenever surgery is planned for a suspect or confirmed COVID-19 patient or any patient who poses an infection risk. Regional anesthesia has benefits of preservation of respiratory function, avoidance of aerosolization and hence viral transmission. This article explores the practical considerations and recommended measures for performing regional anesthesia in this group of patients, focusing on control measures geared towards ensuring patient and staff safety, equipment protection, and infection prevention. By doing so, we hope to address an issue that may have downstream implications in the way we practice infection control in anesthesia, with particular relevance to this new era of emerging infectious diseases and novel pathogens. The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is not the first, and certainly will not be the last novel virus that will lead to worldwide outbreaks. Having a well thought out regional anesthesia plan to manage these patients in this new normal will ensure the best possible outcome for both the patient and the perioperative management team.

anesthesiology
Endonasal instrumentation and aerosolization risk in the era of COVID‐19: simulation, literature review, and proposed mitigation strategies

Alan D. Workman,D. Bradley Welling,Bob S. Carter,William T. Curry,Eric H. Holbrook,Stacey T. Gray,George A. Scangas,Benjamin S. Bleier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.22577

2020-05-22

Abstract:Introduction: International experience with COVID‐19 suggests it poses a significant risk of infectious transmission to skull base surgeons, due to high nasal viral titers and the unknown potential for aerosol generation during endonasal instrumentation. The purpose of this study was to simulate aerosolization events over a range of endoscopic procedures to gain an evidence‐based aerosol risk assessment. Methods: Aerosolization was simulated in a cadaver using fluorescein solution (0.2mg/10ml) and quantified using a blue‐light filter and digital image processing. Outpatient sneezing during endoscopy was simulated using an intranasal atomizer in the presence or absence of intact and modified surgical mask barriers. Surgical aerosolization was simulated during non‐powered instrumentation, suction microdebrider, and high‐speed drilling following nasal fluorescein application. Results: Among the outpatient conditions, a simulated sneeze event generated maximal aerosol distribution at 30cm extending to 66cm. Both an intact surgical mask and a modified VENT mask (which enables endoscopy) eliminated all detectable aerosol spread. Among the surgical conditions, cold instrumentation and microdebrider use did not generate detectable aerosols. Conversely, use of a high‐speed drill produced significant aerosol contamination in all tested conditions. Conclusion: We confirm that aerosolization presents a risk to the endonasal skull base surgeon. In the outpatient setting, use of a barrier significantly reduces aerosol spread. Cold surgical instrumentation and microdebrider use pose significantly less aerosolization risk than a high‐speed drill. Procedures requiring drill use should carry a special designation as an "Aerosol Generating Surgery" to convey this unique risk, and support the need for protective PPE.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

otorhinolaryngology
The aerosol box for intubation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: an in-situ simulation crossover study

J L Begley,K E Lavery,C P Nickson,D J Brewster

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15115

IF: 12.893

Anaesthesia

Abstract:The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has led to the manufacturing of novel devices to protect clinicians from the risk of transmission, including the aerosol box for use during tracheal intubation. We evaluated the impact of two aerosol boxes (an early-generation box and a latest-generation box) on intubations in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019 with an in-situ simulation crossover study. The simulated process complied with the Safe Airway Society coronavirus disease 2019 airway management guidelines. The primary outcome was intubation time; secondary outcomes included first-pass success and breaches to personal protective equipment. All intubations were performed by specialist (consultant) anaesthetists and video recorded. Twelve anaesthetists performed 36 intubations. Intubation time with no aerosol box was significantly shorter than with the early-generation box (median (IQR [range]) 42.9 (32.9-46.9 [30.9-57.6])s vs. 82.1 (45.1-98.3 [30.8-180.0])s p = 0.002) and the latest-generation box (52.4 (43.1-70.3 [35.7-169.2])s, p = 0.008). No intubations without a box took more than 1 min, whereas 14 (58%) intubations with a box took over 1 min and 4 (17%) took over 2 min (including one failure). Without an aerosol box, all anaesthetists obtained first-pass success. With the early-generation and latest-generation boxes, 9 (75%) and 10 (83%) participants obtained first-pass success, respectively. One breach of personal protective equipment occurred using the early-generation box and seven breaches occurred using the latest-generation box. Aerosol boxes may increase intubation times and therefore expose patients to the risk of hypoxia. They may cause damage to conventional personal protective equipment and therefore place clinicians at risk of infection. Further research is required before these devices can be considered safe for clinical use.
Minimally Required Personal Protective Equipment during Local Anesthesia Surgery in COVID-19: A Simulation Study

Bor-Uei Shyr,Yi-Ting Yeh,Wei-Nung Teng,Chin-Su Liu,Paul Chih-Hsueh Chen,Ling-Ju Huang,Ling-Ming Tseng,Hsu Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004792

2023-01-18

Abstract:In the era of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, surgeons and medical staff are often at a high risk of infection in the operating room, especially when the patient is spontaneously breathing. In this study, we examined the minimum requirements for personal protective equipment with double surgical masks to potentially reduce unnecessary waste of supplies. Methods: Two mannequins were each connected to a test lung machine simulating a surgeon and patient with spontaneous breathing. An aerosol generator containing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 virion particle substitutes was connected to the patient mannequin. The sampling points for the target molecules were set at different distances from the patient mannequin and sent for multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction analysis. Three clinical scenarios were designed, which differed in terms of the operating room pressure and whether a fabric curtain barrier was installed between the mannequins. Results: Analysis of the multiplex quantitative polymerase chain reaction results showed that the cycle threshold (Ct) value of the target molecule increased as the distance from the aerosol source increased. In the negative-pressure operating room, the Ct values were significantly increased at all sample points compared with the normal pressure room setting. The Ct value sampled at the surgeon mannequin wearing double face masks was significantly increased when a cloth curtain barrier was set up between the two mannequins. Conclusion: Double surgical masks provide elementary surgeon protection against COVID-19 in a negative pressure operating room, with a physical barrier in place between the surgeon and patient who is spontaneously breathing during local anesthesia or sedated surgery.
Aerosol containment device for airway management of patients with COVID-19: a narrative review

Tomoyuki Saito,Takashi Asai

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-020-02879-4

Abstract:Severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), is highly contagious. To protect healthcare workers from infection during airway management, some expert recommendations and guidelines recommended wearing P2/N95 masks, goggles or glasses, glove, face-shields, and gowns as standard personal protective equipment (PPE). Nevertheless, several simulation studies have suggested that the standard PPE may not fully protect healthcare workers. Dr. Hsien Yung Lai introduced an acrylic box ("aerosol box") as a part of PPE during airway management. Since then, several companies and healthcare workers have made their own modified devices ("aerosol containment device"), and the use of such a device has spread worldwide, without being formally assessed for its effectiveness, efficacy and safety. Several simulation studies have indicated that "aerosol containment device" would make tracheal intubation more difficult. In addition, the device would prevent the spread of droplets from a patient, but may increase the risk of healthcare workers being exposed to a higher concentration of viral aerosols. Therefore, the current state of knowledge indicates that an "aerosol containment device" without vacuum mechanism has only limited efficacy in protecting healthcare workers from viral transmission.
A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Virtual Versus Direct Airway Assessment in the Preoperative Period in Patients Presenting for Neurosurgery: A Quest for Safer Preoperative Practice in Neuroanesthesia in the Backdrop of the COVID-19 Pandemic!

Ajay Hrishi,Unnikrishnan Prathapadas,Ranganatha Praveen,Smita Vimala,Manikandan Sethuraman,Ajay Prasad Hrishi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1735824

2021-09-28

Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice

Abstract:Abstract Objectives Neurosurgical patients with cervical spine pathologies, craniofacial and craniovertebral junction anomalies, recurrent cervical spine, and posterior fossa surgeries frequently present with an airway that is anticipated to be difficult. Although the routine physical evaluation is nonaerosol-generating, Mallampati scoring, mouth opening, and assessment of lower cranial nerve function could potentially generate aerosols, imposing a greater risk of acquiring severe acute respiratory syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. Moreover, airway evaluation requires the patient to remove the mask, thereby posing a greater risk to the assessing anesthesiologist. Thus, we designed this study to evaluate the efficacy of virtual airway assessment (VAA) done via telemedicine in comparison to direct airway assessment (DAA), and assess the feasibility of VAA as a part of the preanesthetic evaluation (PAE) of patients presenting for neurosurgery in the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods A total of 55 patients presenting for elective neurosurgical procedures were recruited in this prospective, observational study. The preoperative assessment of the airway was first done by a remote anesthetist via an encrypted video call, using a smartphone which served the purpose of telemedicine equipment, followed by a direct assessment by the attending anesthetist. The following parameters were assessed: mouth opening (MO), presence of any anomalies of tongue and palate, Mallampati classification (MPC) grading, thyromental distance (TMD), upper lip bite test (ULBT), neck movements, and Look-Evaluate-Mallampati-Obstruction-Neck mobility (LEMON) scoring system. Statistical Analysis Demographic parameters were expressed as mean ± SD. Agreement between the values obtained by VAA and DAA parameters were analyzed with the Kappa test. Results We observed a “perfect agreement” between the DAA and VAA with regard to MO. Assessment of ULBT, neck movements, and the LEMON score had an overall “almost perfect agreement” between the DAA and VAA. We also observed a “substantial agreement” between VAA and DAA during the assessment of MPC grading and TMD. Conclusion Our study shows that PAE and VAA via telemedicine can reliably be used as an alternative to direct physical preanesthetic consultation in the COVID-19 scenario. This could reduce unnecessary exposure of anesthesiologists to potential asymptomatic COVID-positive patients, thereby protecting the available skilled workforce, without any significant compromise to patient care.
Recognizing and Mitigating Risk of Ophthalmic Regional Anesthesia

Brad Wakeman,Robert William Andrew Machuk,Rizwan Somani,Dean Y. Mah,Ian M. MacDonald

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49386-2_23

2017-01-01

Abstract:Key PointsWith appropriate training and experience, regional anesthesia can be delivered safely and effectively to patients undergoing ophthalmologic procedures.Major complications of ophthalmologic regional anesthesia can be circumvented by avoiding deep penetration of the orbit, not inserting the needle tip 31 mm beyond the orbital rim during retrobulbar injection, and having the patient direct their eyes in primary gaze position during needle insertion and injection.Specific complications that may arise in conjunction with ophthalmologic regional anesthesia include hematoma, brainstem anesthesia, damage to the globe or optic nerve, strabismus, and unintended intra-arterial injection of local anesthetics.Topical anesthetics (local anesthetic drops) have become increasingly popular for cataract surgery; drawbacks include risk of corneal toxicity, short block duration, and inability to immobilize the globe and eyelid.Sub-Tenon’s anesthesia is an alternative to blocks using peri- and retrobulbar injections. Although popular and considered overwhelmingly safe, the sub-Tenon’s approach does carry risk of complications, including pain, chemosis, and subconjunctival hemorrhage.
Development and validation of a patient face-mounted, negative-pressure antechamber for reducing exposure of healthcare workers to aerosolized particles during endonasal surgery

Mark Lee,Hazel T Rivera-Rosario,Matthew H Kim,Gregory P Bewley,Jane Wang,Zellman Warhaft,Bradley Stylman,Angela I Park,Aoife MacMahon,Ashutosh Kacker,Theodore H Schwartz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.10.JNS202745

2021-05-14

Abstract:Objective: The authors developed a negative-pressure, patient face-mounted antechamber and tested its efficacy as a tool for sequestering aerated particles and improving the safety of endonasal surgical procedures. Methods: Antechamber prototyping was performed with 3D printing and silicone-elastomer molding. The lowest vacuum settings needed to meet specifications for class I biosafety cabinets (flow rate ≥ 0.38 m/sec) were determined using an anemometer. A cross-validation approach with two different techniques, optical particle sizing and high-speed videography/shadowgraphy, was used to identify the minimum pressures required to sequester aerosolized materials. At the minimum vacuum settings identified, physical parameters were quantified, including flow rate, antechamber pressure, and time to clearance. Results: The minimum tube pressures needed to meet specifications for class I biosafety cabinets were -1.0 and -14.5 mm Hg for the surgical chambers with ("closed face") and without ("open face") the silicone diaphragm covering the operative port, respectively. Optical particle sizing did not detect aerosol generation from surgical drilling at these vacuum settings; however, videography estimated higher thresholds required to contain aerosols, at -6 and -35 mm Hg. Simulation of surgical movement disrupted aerosol containment visualized by shadowgraphy in the open-faced but not the closed-faced version of the mask; however, the closed-face version of the mask required increased negative pressure (-15 mm Hg) to contain aerosols during surgical simulation. Conclusions: Portable, negative-pressure surgical compartments can contain aerosols from surgical drilling with pressures attainable by standard hospital and clinic vacuums. Future studies are needed to carefully consider the reliability of different techniques for detecting aerosols.
Effect of Taping Face Masks on Quantitative Particle Counts Near the Eye: Implications for Intravitreal Injections in the COVID-19 Era

William G. Schultheis,James E. Sharpe,Qiang Zhang,Samir N. Patel,Ajay E. Kuriyan,Allen Chiang,Sunir J. Garg,Jason Hsu,William G Schultheis,James E Sharpe,Qiang Zhang,Samir N Patel,Ajay E Kuriyan,Allen Chiang,Sunir J Garg,Jason Hsu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2021.01.021

IF: 5.488

2021-05-01

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract:<h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Purpose</h3><p>: To determine the effect of taping the top of face masks on air particle counts directed toward the eye during simulated intravitreal injections.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Design</h3><p>: Prospective observational crossover study.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Methods</h3><p>: Thirteen healthy subjects were recruited. Each wore a cloth, surgical, or N95 mask in randomized order. The number of air particles were quantified using a particle counter suspended over the right eye while each subject breathed normally, deeply, or spoke using a standardized script. Particle counts were obtained with the top of each mask taped and untaped. The main outcome measurements were particle counts in the size classes of 0.3 μm, 0.5 μm, 1 μm, 3 μm, 5 μm, 10 μm, and total particle count.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>: Taping cloth masks while subjects were speaking significantly reduced particle counts for the size classes of 0.3 μm (p=0.03), 0.5 μm (p=0.01), 1 μm (p=0.03), and total particle counts (p=0.008) compared to no taping. Taping the top of cloth masks during normal or deep breathing did not significantly affect particle counts compared to no taping. Taping the top of surgical or N95 masks did not significantly alter particle counts for any breathing condition tested.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>: Taping the top of cloth masks prior to simulated intravitreal injections significantly reduced air particle counts directed toward the eye when subjects were speaking compared to no taping. This may have implications for decreasing air particles reaching the eye during intravitreal injections, including aerosolized droplets from a patient's mouth that may carry oral pathogens.</p>

ophthalmology
Increased microbial loading in aerosols produced by non-contact air-puff tonometer and relative suggestions for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Hui Guo,Wei Li,Yingying Huang,Xiaoyan Li,Zhi Li,Hongxia Zhou,Enhua Sun,Li Li,Jisheng Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240421

IF: 3.7

2020-10-08

PLoS ONE

Abstract:To evaluate the microbial loading in aerosols produced after air-puff by non-contact tonometer (NCT) as well as the effect of alcohol disinfection on the inhibition of microbes and thus to provide suggestions for the prevention and control of COVID-19 in ophthalmic departments of hospitals or clinics during the great pandemics.A cross-sectional study was carried out in this study. A NIDEK NCT was used for intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement for patients who visited Department of Ophthalmology in Qilu Hospital of Shandong University during March 18–25 2020. After ultra-violate (UV) light disinfection, the room air was sampled for 5 minutes. Before and after alcohol disinfection, the air samples and nozzle surface samples were respectively collected by plate exposure method and sterile moist cotton swab technique after predetermined times of NCT air-puff. Microbial colony counts were calculated after incubation for 48 hours. Finally, mass spectrometry was performed for the accurate identification of microbial species.Increased microbial colonies were detected from air samples close to NCT nozzle after air-puff compared with air samples at a distance of 1 meter from the nozzle (<em>p</em> = 0.001). Interestingly, none microbes were detected on the surface of NCT nozzle. Importantly, after 75% alcohol disinfection less microbes were detected in the air beside the nozzle (<em>p</em> = 0.003). Microbial species identification showed more than ten strains of microbes, all of which were non-pathogenic.Aerosols containing microbes were produced by NCT air-puff in the ophthalmic consultation room, which may be a possible virus transmission route in the department of ophthalmology during the COVID-19 pandemic. Alcohol disinfection for the nozzle and the surrounding air was efficient at decreasing the microbes contained in the aerosols and theoretically this prevention measure could also inhibit the virus. This will give guidance for the prevention of virus transmission and protection of hospital staff and patients.

multidisciplinary sciences
Airway management practices in Covid ICU during the first and second phase of Covid-19 pandemic: experience from a tertiary care hospital of Western Uttar Pradesh, India

Nazia Nazir,Anupriya Saxena

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35975/apic.v25i5.1640

2021-09-30

Abstract:Key words: Airway management; Intubation; Laryngoscopes; aerosol box; COVID-19 Citation: Nazia N, Saxena A. Airway management practices in Covid ICU during the first and second phase of Covid-19 pandemic: experience from a tertiary care hospital of Western Uttar Pradesh, India (Correspondence). Anaesth. pain intensive care 2021;25(5):689–690 ; DOI: 10.35975/apic.v25i5.1640
Aerosolisation during tracheal intubation and extubation in an operating theatre setting

R S Dhillon,W A Rowin,R S Humphries,K Kevin,J D Ward,T D Phan,L V Nguyen,D D Wynne,D A Scott,Clinical Aerosolisation Study Group,A Yule,Y C Zhao,P M McNeill,N Hutchins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15301

IF: 12.893

Anaesthesia

Abstract:Aerosol-generating procedures such as tracheal intubation and extubation pose a potential risk to healthcare workers because of the possibility of airborne transmission of infection. Detailed characterisation of aerosol quantities, particle size and generating activities has been undertaken in a number of simulations but not in actual clinical practice. The aim of this study was to determine whether the processes of facemask ventilation, tracheal intubation and extubation generate aerosols in clinical practice, and to characterise any aerosols produced. In this observational study, patients scheduled to undergo elective endonasal pituitary surgery without symptoms of COVID-19 were recruited. Airway management including tracheal intubation and extubation was performed in a standard positive pressure operating room with aerosols detected using laser-based particle image velocimetry to detect larger particles, and spectrometry with continuous air sampling to detect smaller particles. A total of 482,960 data points were assessed for complete procedures in three patients. Facemask ventilation, tracheal tube insertion and cuff inflation generated small particles 30-300 times above background noise that remained suspended in airflows and spread from the patient's facial region throughout the confines of the operating theatre. Safe clinical practice of these procedures should reflect these particle profiles. This adds to data that inform decisions regarding the appropriate precautions to take in a real-world setting.
Ventilation-Based Strategy to Manage Intraoperative Aerosol Viral Transmission in the Era of SARS-CoV-2

Ayoola T. Brimmo,Ayoub Glia,Juan S. Barajas-Gamboa,Carlos Abril,John Rodríguez,Matthew Kroh,Mohammad A. Qasaimeh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life14030313

2024-02-29

Life

Abstract:In operating theaters, ventilation systems are designed to protect the patient from airborne contamination for minimizing risks of surgical site infections (SSIs). Ventilation systems often produce an airflow pattern that continuously pushes air out of the area surrounding the operating table, and hence reduces the resident time of airborne pathogen-carrying particles at the patient's location. As a result, patient-released airborne particles due to the use of powered tools, such as surgical smoke and insufflated CO2, typically circulate within the room. This circulation exposes the surgical team to airborne infection—especially when operating on a patient with infectious diseases, including COVID-19. This study examined the flow pattern of functional ventilation configurations in view of developing ventilation-based strategies to protect both the patient and the surgical team from aerosolized infections. A favorable design that minimized particle circulation was deduced using experimentally validated numerical models. The parameters adapted to quantify circulation of airborne particles were particles' half-life and elevation. The results show that the footprint of the outlet ducts and resulting flow pattern are important parameters for minimizing particle circulation. Overall, this study presents a modular framework for optimizing the ventilation systems that permits a switch in operation configuration to suit different operating procedures.

biology
Effect of portable negative pressure units on expelled aerosols in the operating room environment

Marko Popovic,Jonathan Beathe,Ejiro Gbaje,Marla Sharp,Stavros G Memtsoudis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2022-103489

2022-04-01

Abstract:Introduction Spontaneously breathing patients undergoing procedures under regional anesthesia can expose operating room personnel to infectious agents. The use of localized negative pressure within proximity of a patient’s airway is expected to reduce the amount of bioaerosols dispersed particularly for anesthesia staff who are frequently near the patient’s airway. Methods In the experiment, aerosols were produced using a polydisperse aerosol generator with nebulized saline. A portable negative pressure unit was set up at set distances of 10 cm and 30 cm with the aim of reducing aerosol particle counts detected by a laser-based particle counter. Results Without the portable negative pressure unit, the median concentration of 0.5 μm aerosols detected was 3128 (1533, 22832) particles/ft 3 /min. With the portable negative pressure unit 10 cm and 30 cm from the site of aerosol emittance, the median concentration compared with background concentration was −0.5 (−8, 8) particles/ft 3 /min and 398 (89, 1749) particles/ft 3 /min, respectively. Conclusions For particle concentrations of 0.5 μm, 0.7 μm, and 1.0 μm a significant amount of aerosol reduction was observed (p<0.001). Further experiments are warranted to assess the safety of staff when encountering a potentially infectious patient in the operating room.

anesthesiology
All India difficult airway association (AIDAA) consensus guidelines for airway management in the operating room during the COVID-19 pandemic

Apeksh Patwa,Amit Shah,Rakesh Garg,Jigeeshu Vasishtha Divatia,Pankaj Kundra,Jeson Rajan Doctor,Sumalatha Radhakrishna Shetty,Syed Moied Ahmed,Sabyasachi Das,Sheila Nainan Myatra,JigeeshuVasishtha Divatia,JesonRajan Doctor,SumalathaRadhakrishna Shetty,SyedMoied Ahmed,SheilaNainan Myatra

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/ija.ija_498_20

2020-01-01

Indian Journal of Anaesthesia

Abstract:Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) which causes coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is a highly contagious virus. The closed environment of the operation room (OR) with aerosol generating airway management procedures increases the risk of transmission of infection among the anaesthesiologists and other OR personnel. Wearing complete, fluid impermeable personal protective equipment (PPE) for airway related procedures is recommended. Team preparation, clear methods of communication and appropriate donning and doffing of PPEs are essential to prevent spread of the infection. Optimal pre oxygenation, rapid sequence induction and video laryngoscope aided tracheal intubation (TI) are recommended. Supraglottic airways (SGA) and surgical cricothyroidotomy should be preferred for airway rescue. High flow nasal oxygen, face mask ventilation, nebulisation, small bore cannula cricothyroidotomy with jet ventilation should be avoided. Tracheal extubation should be conducted with the same levels of precaution as TI. The All India Difficult Airway Association (AIDAA) aims to provide consensus guidelines for safe airway management in the OR, while attempting to prevent transmission of infection to the OR personnel during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Aerosol generating procedural risks and concomitant mitigation strategies in orthodontics amid COVID-19 pandemic - An updated evidence-based review

Harpreet Singh,Raj Kumar Maurya,Poonam Sharma,Pranav Kapoor,Tanmay Mittal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ortho.2021.05.004

Abstract:Importance: The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has posed unique challenges to orthodontic profession by adversely impacting provision of in-office orthodontic care due to prevailing uncertainty around risks pertaining to splatter and 'aerosol-generating procedures' (AGPs). This review aims to provide an insight into the prevailing and emerging evidence informing potential risks related to splatter and AGPs, and risk mitigation strategies employed for reducing the potential risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission from dental bioaerosols. Methods: PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, LILACS, WHO COVID-19 databases and preprint databases were searched for eligible English language publications. Citation chasing was undertaken up until the review date of 4 January 2021. Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment was undertaken independently in duplicate, or else by consultation with a third author. Results: Following filter application and duplicates removed, a total of 13 articles assessing procedural mitigation measures were included. Seven included studies revealed overall low-risk of bias. The overall risk varied from unclear to high for rest of the studies, with the most concerning domains being blinding of the participants and the personnel and blinding of the outcome assessors. Accumulated consensual evidence points towards the use of dental suction devices with wide bore aspirating tips as effective procedural mitigation strategies. Variations in the literature can be observed concerning aerosol transmission associated with water spray use during debonding. Emerging direct evidence consistently supports adjunctive use of pre-procedural povidone-iodine mouthrinse to mitigate direct transmission risk in the orthodontic practice. Conclusions: A thorough risk assessment concerning AGPs and implementation of consistent and evidence-based procedural mitigation strategies may play an indispensable role in navigating optimal orthodontic practice through unforeseen similar pandemic threats. High-quality robust research focussing on more biologically relevant models of dental bioaerosols in orthodontic settings is warranted.
A Comprehensive Strategy for Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery During the COVID-19 Epidemic in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital in Wenzhou, China.

Jia Zhang,Ioannis M. Aslanides,Vasileios Selimis,Nan-Ji Lu,Wei-Jie Liu,Hong-Xiao Jiang,Chao Zhang,Chen-Chen Xu,Qin-Mei Wang,Jia Qu,Shi-Hao Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/4835630

2020-01-01

Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract:The novel coronavirus pneumonia COVID-19 is caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, which is highly contagious, has a long incubation period, and can be detected in patients' tears and conjunctival secretions. In this study, we describe our experience regarding the necessary protective measures that need to be taken during ophthalmic examination and treatment. The authors reviewed the clinical work arrangements during the epidemic situation at the Eye Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University in China and analyzed the prevention and control measures that were applied during the laser corneal refractive surgery process. The comprehensive protection protocol, which was established throughout the entire process, included both horizontal (medical staff-patient, medical staff-medical staff, and patient-patient) and vertical (preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative transmission assessment) approach and was mainly focused on strengthening the protection against potential aerosol transmission that may occur during intraocular pressure measurements and laser ablation. The described and proposed protocol, along with the further guidelines followed by the medical personnel, proved to be efficacious and contributed significantly to the control of the COVID-19 outbreak and the protection of both the patients and the medical staff.

Aerosol prevention box for regional anaesthesia for eye surgery in COVID times

Aerosol box for protection during airway manipulation in covid-19 patients

Patient generated aerosol in the context of ophthalmic surgery

Anaesthesia Practice in the First Wave of the COVID-19 Outbreak in the United States: a Population-Based Cohort Study.

Practical considerations for performing regional anesthesia: lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic

Endonasal instrumentation and aerosolization risk in the era of COVID‐19: simulation, literature review, and proposed mitigation strategies

The aerosol box for intubation in coronavirus disease 2019 patients: an in-situ simulation crossover study

Minimally Required Personal Protective Equipment during Local Anesthesia Surgery in COVID-19: A Simulation Study

Aerosol containment device for airway management of patients with COVID-19: a narrative review

A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Virtual Versus Direct Airway Assessment in the Preoperative Period in Patients Presenting for Neurosurgery: A Quest for Safer Preoperative Practice in Neuroanesthesia in the Backdrop of the COVID-19 Pandemic!

Recognizing and Mitigating Risk of Ophthalmic Regional Anesthesia

Development and validation of a patient face-mounted, negative-pressure antechamber for reducing exposure of healthcare workers to aerosolized particles during endonasal surgery

Effect of Taping Face Masks on Quantitative Particle Counts Near the Eye: Implications for Intravitreal Injections in the COVID-19 Era

Increased microbial loading in aerosols produced by non-contact air-puff tonometer and relative suggestions for the prevention of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)

Airway management practices in Covid ICU during the first and second phase of Covid-19 pandemic: experience from a tertiary care hospital of Western Uttar Pradesh, India

Aerosolisation during tracheal intubation and extubation in an operating theatre setting

Ventilation-Based Strategy to Manage Intraoperative Aerosol Viral Transmission in the Era of SARS-CoV-2

Effect of portable negative pressure units on expelled aerosols in the operating room environment

All India difficult airway association (AIDAA) consensus guidelines for airway management in the operating room during the COVID-19 pandemic

Aerosol generating procedural risks and concomitant mitigation strategies in orthodontics amid COVID-19 pandemic - An updated evidence-based review

A Comprehensive Strategy for Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery During the COVID-19 Epidemic in a Tertiary Teaching Hospital in Wenzhou, China.