Abstract:Purpose This paper aims to illustrate the extensive benefits of qualitative data analysis as a rarely undertaken process in post-occupancy evaluation surveys. As a result, there is limited evidence of what occupants say about their buildings, especially for operational parameters, as opposed to how they rate them. While quantitative analyses provide useful information on how workers feel about workplace operational factors, qualitative analyses provide richer information on what aspects of the workplace workers identify as influential to their comfort, well-being and productivity. Design/methodology/approach The authors analysed 6,938 comments from office buildings worldwide on workers’ perception of workplace operational factors: design, storage, needs, space at desks and storage in their work environments. These factors were analysed based on the buildings’ design intent and use, and the associated comments were coded into positive, negative and balanced comments. The authors used a combination of coding, descriptive analysis, content analysis and word cloud to dissect the comments. Findings The findings showed that whereas workers rated these operational factors favourably, there were significantly more negative comments about each factor. Also, the Chi-square test showed a significant association ( p < 0.01) between the satisfaction scale and the type of comments received for all the operational factors. This means that when a factor is rated high in the satisfaction score (5–7), there were fewer negative and more positive comments and vice versa. The word cloud analysis highlighted vital aspects of the office environment the workers mostly commented on, such as open plan design, natural lighting, space and windows, toilets, facilities, kitchens, meeting room booking systems, storage and furniture. Research limitations/implications This study highlights the importance of dissecting building occupants’ comments as integral to building performance monitoring and measurement. These emphasise the richness and value of respondents’ comments and the importance of critically analysing them. A limitation is that only 6,938 comments were viable for analysis because most comments were either incomplete with no meaning or were not provided. This underlines the importance of encouraging respondents to comment and express their feelings in questionnaire surveys. Also, the building use studies questionnaire data set presents extensive opportunities for further analyses of interrelationships between demographics, building characteristics and environmental and operational factors. Practical implications The findings from this study can be applied to future projects and facility management to maintain and improve office buildings throughout their life cycle. Also, these findings are essential in predicting the requirements of future workplaces for robust workplace designs and management. Originality/value The authors identified specific comments on the performance of workplaces across the globe, showing similarities and differences between sustainable, conventional, commercial and institutional buildings. Specifically, the analysis showed that office workers’ comments do not always corroborate the ratings they give their buildings. There was a significantly higher percentage of negative comments than positive comments despite the high satisfaction scores of the operational factors.

Tenants’ office leasing motivators toward the tangible and symbolic aspects of office buildings: Between Green and Non-Green Buildings

The effect of sustainability on commercial occupiers' building choice

Has the advent of green office buildings influenced the rental depreciation of conventional office buildings? A case study in the Kuala Lumpur Golden Triangle

“Do office workers’ comments corroborate the ratings they give their buildings?” A qualitative analysis of comments on operational factors in the workplace

Barriers to “green operation” of commercial office buildings

Understanding Green Building Energy Performance in the Context of Commercial Estates: A Multi-Year and Cross-Region Analysis Using the Australian Commercial Building Disclosure Database

Green Building Occupant Satisfaction: Evidence from the Australian Higher Education Sector

Impact of Occupants’ Behaviour on Energy Consumption and Corresponding Strategies in Office Buildings

Market Adoption of Healthy Buildings in the Office Sector: A Global Study from the Owner's Perspective

Are Green and Healthy Building Labels Counterproductive in Emerging Markets? An Examination of Office Rental Contracts in India

The Economic Value of Green Office Buildings in Tokyo *

The Impact of Space Design on Occupants' Satisfaction with Indoor Environment in University Dormitories

Occupant satisfaction in Three-Star-certified office buildings based on comparative study using LEED and BREEAM

Green Building for Office Interiors: Challenges and Opportunities

Impacts of Green Certifications, Ventilation and Office Types on Occupant Satisfaction with Indoor Environmental Quality

Comparing better building design and operation to other corporate strategies for improving organizational productivity: a review and synthesis

Are green buildings more satisfactory? A review of global evidence

Perception of Overall Quality of Life Among Occupants of Green and Non-Green Office Buildings in Malaysia

Towards an environmentally sustainable rental housing sector

Analysis of residential satisfaction in the conversion of Beijing's stock buildings into rental housing

The Determinant Factors of Green Office Layout Towards Employee Workplace Productivity